I haven't read the linked articled (yet), but I wanted to urge everyone to check out r/the_donald. It is the strangest online community that I've seen. Truth doesn't really matter unless it supports us, everyone who says good things about us is right and everyone who doesn't is a corrupt MSM cuck libtard. To get banned you don't even have to be critical of Trump. If you're even ambiguous you'll get banned. In a sense…
Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following
11–18 of 18 posts
Re: Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following
#12I haven't read the linked articled (yet), but I wanted to urge everyone to check out r/the_donald. It is the strangest online community that I've seen. Truth doesn't really matter unless it supports us, everyone who says good things about us is right and everyone who doesn't is a corrupt MSM cuck libtard. To get banned you don't even have to be critical of Trump. If you're even ambiguous you'll get banned. In a sense…
It sounds just like the /r/Hillary_Clinton subreddit I briefly checked out during the election. I said something a little bit critical of Hillary and was immediately banned. This is just how Americans are these days. You have to pick a camp, and you need to agree 100% with everything in that camp or else you'll be shunned. And there's only two main camps too; if you try to pick an alternative camps, or even a camp th…
Re: Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following
#13The title of this piece doesn't adequately reflect the fascinating methodology it contains. The 538 team uses latent sentiment analysis to create a kind of algebra for subreddits, i.e. r/running + r/weightlifting = r/fitness. Politics aside, it's (IMHO) well worth the 15 minutes it takes to read. I'd love to see HN readers more experienced with the methodology take it to task and see what shakes out.
Re: Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following
#14I haven't read the linked articled (yet), but I wanted to urge everyone to check out r/the_donald. It is the strangest online community that I've seen. Truth doesn't really matter unless it supports us, everyone who says good things about us is right and everyone who doesn't is a corrupt MSM cuck libtard. To get banned you don't even have to be critical of Trump. If you're even ambiguous you'll get banned. In a sense…
It sounds just like the /r/Hillary_Clinton subreddit I briefly checked out during the election. I said something a little bit critical of Hillary and was immediately banned. This is just how Americans are these days. You have to pick a camp, and you need to agree 100% with everything in that camp or else you'll be shunned. And there's only two main camps too; if you try to pick an alternative camps, or even a camp th…
Re: Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following
#15This story is extremely fascinating and relevant to the HackerNews Community but it's already been Shadow Banned. Neat.
Re: Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following
#16The code is on GH [1] and the data is on BigQuery [2]. [1] https://github.com/fivethirtyeight/data/tree/master/subreddi... [2] https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/fh-bigquery:reddit_c...
https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/fh-bigquery:reddit_c...
Re: Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following
#17I haven't read the linked articled (yet), but I wanted to urge everyone to check out r/the_donald. It is the strangest online community that I've seen. Truth doesn't really matter unless it supports us, everyone who says good things about us is right and everyone who doesn't is a corrupt MSM cuck libtard. To get banned you don't even have to be critical of Trump. If you're even ambiguous you'll get banned. In a sense…
shrug It's just NeoGAF with some surface level differences.
GAF is wider focused, has a different position, and uses different memes to be dismissive of disagreement. But overall this describes it's type of political discussion and moderation of wrongthink to a T.
Re: Dissecting Trump’s Most Rabid Online Following
#18This story is extremely fascinating and relevant to the HackerNews Community but it's already been Shadow Banned. Neat.
sorry but how can someone/some group shadow ban a story and who do you suppose would be behind shadow banning this one?
They do it constantly to stories deemed "not worthy".