Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Untitled topic

news.ycombinator.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–15 of 15 posts

Re: undefined

#11

Post by jasonkester »

jhawk28 wrote: post #10

New Coke indirectly made the company TONs of money. Before New Coke, cane sugar was used as sweeteners (expensive). They used high fructose corn syrup in New Coke and caused everyone to "hate" it. When they released Coke Classic, they used the old formula, but kept the corn syrup. Because people had become used to the taste, they did not notice the difference. This allowed them to considerably lower the cost of the m…

In addition is was a genius marketing move. People who hadn't had a coke in years suddenly remembered that they were HUGE coca cola fans and rallied to get it back on the market.

When classic coke went on the market, sales were way higher than they had been before the switch. It was a smart move.

Re: undefined

#12

Post by jasonkester »

EliRivers wrote: post #7

DDT was a fantastic invention for combating malaria. Great invention, terrible application thereof.

Especially in light of

a.) the zillions of Chinese farmers who died from replacement insecticides that were actually bad for you right now, as opposed to in 20 years.

b.) the return of Malaria as a disease that kills tens or hundreds of thousands each year, from its state of "not really an issue anymore" in the DDT era.

Re: undefined

#13

Post by philwelch »

jhawk28 wrote: post #10

New Coke indirectly made the company TONs of money. Before New Coke, cane sugar was used as sweeteners (expensive). They used high fructose corn syrup in New Coke and caused everyone to "hate" it. When they released Coke Classic, they used the old formula, but kept the corn syrup. Because people had become used to the taste, they did not notice the difference. This allowed them to considerably lower the cost of the m…

There's a lot of urban legends about New Coke that are along these lines, but they're not entirely accurate:

http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/newcoke.asp

Re: undefined

#14

Post by philwelch »

RyanMcGreal wrote: post #4
stretchwithme wrote: post #2

Pontiac Aztec is probably the worst invention on the list. But why is Betamax there? I thought it was a viable format that just didn't win.

Betamax was technically superior to VHS, but VHS won because its cheap, permissive licencing earned it the crucial network effects that made it the default platform. (Incidentally, you could say exactly the same thing about MS-DOS.)

Also, VHS traded off longer runtime against higher quality, while Betamax traded off the other way. Turns out people don't like switching cassettes in the middle of a movie.
Post reply on HN