from the article > They question itself was already curious but if we dive deeper into the story we see the claims have been made by Semi-Accurate, not the most unbiased source. yup, charlie loves to make fun of intel, but then, this is different. further down, in the comments: > (wccftech) This article has an update on it. It says: > [UPDATED Feb 26 2017 7:16 PM ET] > The editors-in-chief of two of Americas top P…
Then again, we have no idea what was in those emails, and wccftech is openly pro-amd, so even though I have no reason to think they're lying, they might easily still be interpreting things in an overly negative light.
Without a better overview (or at the very least somebody who has that overview and you trust to be relatively unbiased) it's hard to be sure what to make of this (IMHO).