Earlier quoted context omitted.
He ate 40 teaspoons which is 160 grams of sugar. Also, perhaps the fact that he went from very little sugar to 160 grams a day caused rapid weight gain. I know for instance that your body changes over time to burn fat more efficiently if you are on a lower carb diet, perhaps the reverse is true as well.
Weight gain is impossible without the necessary amount of calories. It is the simple law of conservation of mass/energy. 160 calories * 21 days = 3360 calories. This is enough to gain about 1 pound of weight, not 19.
I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
11–20 of 43 posts
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#12Ignoring confounding variables, and a sample size of one caused me to discount this "study". While I'm sure sugar consumption is an issue, this escapade seems like more of a capitalist venture than anything else.
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
He ate 40 teaspoons which is 160 grams of sugar. Also, perhaps the fact that he went from very little sugar to 160 grams a day caused rapid weight gain. I know for instance that your body changes over time to burn fat more efficiently if you are on a lower carb diet, perhaps the reverse is true as well.
Weight gain is impossible without the necessary amount of calories. It is the simple law of conservation of mass/energy. 160 calories * 21 days = 3360 calories. This is enough to gain about 1 pound of weight, not 19.
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
He ate 40 teaspoons which is 160 grams of sugar. Also, perhaps the fact that he went from very little sugar to 160 grams a day caused rapid weight gain. I know for instance that your body changes over time to burn fat more efficiently if you are on a lower carb diet, perhaps the reverse is true as well.
Weight gain is impossible without the necessary amount of calories. It is the simple law of conservation of mass/energy. 160 calories * 21 days = 3360 calories. This is enough to gain about 1 pound of weight, not 19.
However, you're really oversimplifying weight gain. Hormones play an important role in how much fat is stored and how much your metabolism burns. And the type of food you eat can affect your hormones.
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
What else did he eat? Sugar will raise your insulin level, which directs more blood sugar to fat cells. So it's not just a case of calories in calories out.
It is a matter of calories in calories out. He didn't just increase his concentration of fat, he straight up gained 8.5 kilograms of mass.
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#16The math does not add up. 40 grams of sugar does not have enough calories for you to gain 3 kilograms in 12 days, or 8.5 kilograms in 21 days. Moreover, if he ate as much as the average American eats, how is it that the average American has not experienced what he has? The guy almost gained 1 pound a day.
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#17He's pushing his agenda pretty hard. It's good that it's an obvious bias, but it makes the film a bit exhausting to watch. The "sugar is pure evil" line is relentlessly pushed through the film. That's a shame, because he has some really good points, especially around foods perceived as healthy.
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#18The math does not add up. 40 grams of sugar does not have enough calories for you to gain 3 kilograms in 12 days, or 8.5 kilograms in 21 days. Moreover, if he ate as much as the average American eats, how is it that the average American has not experienced what he has? The guy almost gained 1 pound a day.
It's likely that taking on that much sugar all of a sudden would require him to increase his fluid intake, and so some of the weight may be water.
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
What else did he eat? Sugar will raise your insulin level, which directs more blood sugar to fat cells. So it's not just a case of calories in calories out.
It is a matter of calories in calories out. He didn't just increase his concentration of fat, he straight up gained 8.5 kilograms of mass.
> promoting the absorption of, especially, glucose from the blood into fat, liver and skeletal muscle cells
> in the tissues that can carry out these reactions, glycogen and fat synthesis from glucose are stimulated
> The breakdown of triglycerides by adipose tissue into free fatty acids and glycerol is also inhibited
> Increased lipid synthesis – insulin forces fat cells to take in blood glucose, which is converted into triglycerides (aka fat)
> Increased esterification of fatty acids – forces adipose tissue to make neutral fats (i.e., triglycerides) from fatty acids
> Decreased lipolysis – forces reduction in conversion of fat cell lipid stores into blood fatty acids and glycerol
Kcals in kcals out fails practically every overweight person over 30 I know. But they won't hear about biochemistry. Poor folks aren't even eating that much, but what they do eat sufficiently inhibits liberation of the many-months-worths of energy stores they carry around all day. Don't envy them, full of energy yet out of energy!
Re: I ate 40 teaspoons of sugar a day. This is what happened (2015)
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Weight gain is impossible without the necessary amount of calories. It is the simple law of conservation of mass/energy. 160 calories * 21 days = 3360 calories. This is enough to gain about 1 pound of weight, not 19.
Its 160 grams of sugar which equals 619 calories which leads to 12999 calories in 21 days. Still less than 4 pounds though. However, you're really oversimplifying weight gain. Hormones play an important role in how much fat is stored and how much your metabolism burns. And the type of food you eat can affect your hormones.