11–20 of 119 posts
Trading privacy for a false sense of security, are we?
Trading privacy? Can you elaborate?
Moving FOSS into the cloud as a SaS sounds kinda regressive to me...
I've been out of touch with Mongo for a while, but when did it stop being common practice to just hide :27017 behind a firewall with only your app's DB access layer (or, at most, a few nodes in the local subnet) talking to it?
Probably around the same time ops were deemed useless :) [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13644789
The missing piece for the AWS serverless story is a database that is suitable for writing real world applications. DynamoDB is far from suitable for that task, which leaves AWS serverless with no good database.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Trading privacy? Can you elaborate?
The idea of storing sensitive data at one of the most data hungry company in the world "for security", doesn't sound like it came from a genius. I thought I was pretty clear earlier? Moving FOSS into the cloud as a SaS sounds kinda regressive to me...
AWS needs something like this. The missing piece for the AWS serverless story is a database that is suitable for writing real world applications. DynamoDB is far from suitable for that task, which leaves AWS serverless with no good database.
AWS needs something like this. The missing piece for the AWS serverless story is a database that is suitable for writing real world applications. DynamoDB is far from suitable for that task, which leaves AWS serverless with no good database.
why?
AWS needs something like this. The missing piece for the AWS serverless story is a database that is suitable for writing real world applications. DynamoDB is far from suitable for that task, which leaves AWS serverless with no good database.
DynamoDB would be pretty close if it just allowed null values.
AWS needs something like this. The missing piece for the AWS serverless story is a database that is suitable for writing real world applications. DynamoDB is far from suitable for that task, which leaves AWS serverless with no good database.
DynamoDB would be pretty close if it just allowed null values.
What sort of database is effectively useless for querying?
Also they need to ditch the really, really confusiong and limiting scaling model. For a database that advertises scaling as one of its key strengths, DynamoDB sure has a bad scaling story.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The idea of storing sensitive data at one of the most data hungry company in the world "for security", doesn't sound like it came from a genius. I thought I was pretty clear earlier? Moving FOSS into the cloud as a SaS sounds kinda regressive to me...
If you can explain your fears perhaps we would understand, because I still don't know why using Azure is a privacy trade? Does Microsoft "steal" the data?