Live data from Hacker News

Open-source Funding and Support Questionnaire

docs.google.com

11–20 of 39 posts

Re: Open-source Funding and Support Questionnaire

#11
post #5

Weird the title changed from "ask hn: do you" to "open-source funding/suppor questionnaire"? And didn't notice the link before but I guess it was there.

It was, I think that's why the title changed - AskHNs presumably have to be text questions hosted here?

Re: Open-source Funding and Support Questionnaire

#15
A while ago I did a concept study called http://opensourcebay.io to create a marketplace for open source services. This approach in my mind provides the most viability for maintainers/service providers and for people who inevitably need services/training/features. Unfortunately I did not have the initial traction nor the resources to continue on this path.

Re: Open-source Funding and Support Questionnaire

#16
I really think there's an opportunity to make it easier for companies (large and small) to pay for work on open source projects. The complexities I see (as someone who has done it often):

* Knowing who (as an individual or an organization) you can give money to to reliably perform the work. So working out a way of managing this would be huge e.g. I want a feature added to Postgres, who the hell do I speak to? Are they reliable? Is their contribution likely to be accepted upstream?

* The tax/employment logistics can be painful, an intermediary could make that simpler. For large contributions you often have to support multiple people, and this becomes logistical complex VERY easily

* A lot of folks who make their living being supported to work on open source are scornful or outright malevolent towards the things that corps need (e.g. invoicing, statement of work, liability protection)

Re: Open-source Funding and Support Questionnaire

#17
post #16

I really think there's an opportunity to make it easier for companies (large and small) to pay for work on open source projects. The complexities I see (as someone who has done it often): * Knowing who (as an individual or an organization) you can give money to to reliably perform the work. So working out a way of managing this would be huge e.g. I want a feature added to Postgres, who the hell do I speak to? Are the…

Fwiw, I've copied your comments over to https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/987#i....

Re: Open-source Funding and Support Questionnaire

#18
post #16

I really think there's an opportunity to make it easier for companies (large and small) to pay for work on open source projects. The complexities I see (as someone who has done it often): * Knowing who (as an individual or an organization) you can give money to to reliably perform the work. So working out a way of managing this would be huge e.g. I want a feature added to Postgres, who the hell do I speak to? Are the…

It sounds like you've mostly tried to pay for new development on projects? As opposed to remunerating for existing product? Does that sound right?

Re: Open-source Funding and Support Questionnaire

#19
post #16

I really think there's an opportunity to make it easier for companies (large and small) to pay for work on open source projects. The complexities I see (as someone who has done it often): * Knowing who (as an individual or an organization) you can give money to to reliably perform the work. So working out a way of managing this would be huge e.g. I want a feature added to Postgres, who the hell do I speak to? Are the…

PostgreSQL have a list of companies that can help:

https://www.postgresql.org/support/professional_support/

Debian has a list of consultants, many of them are Debian developers:

https://www.debian.org/consultants/

In addition there are a bunch of general and specialised open source consultancies, some examples:

http://www.credativ.us/ https://www.igalia.com/ http://collabora.com/ http://codethink.co.uk/ http://catalyst.co.nz/ http://www.sysmocom.de/ https://www.savoirfairelinux.com/

Post reply on HN