Live data from Hacker News

Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

qz.com

11–20 of 85 posts

Re: Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

#11

Alexa is a voice interface, and a pretty good one at that. I use it primarily for home automation and it works pretty well for that. There is not much intelligence behind it in that regard, but it's very good at recognizing commands, which is what is needed.

The voice recognition is good, but the interface is completely independent of Alexa. The interface is spawned from a group of people brainstorming all the different ways someone can ask to turn on the lights, and then figuring out the ways to deal with all the different inputs.

I'm not sure how common the knowledge is around making an Alexa skill, but I made one as a side project so I might have some insight.

You define a bunch of variables, and describe what form they are likely to come in (number, data, US city, list of strings). It's not strictly bound to any enumeration you use. Then you list out a bunch of phrases that people are expected to say to activate a function. You can pepper the variables into these phrases. Then you link these phrases to functions, which receive the variables as parameters. What you do from there is up to you.

I would say it's a clever way of gradually reducing the complexity, but it does result in putting the "conversation" complexity on the developer. There is no "state" or compound queries unless the developer thought of the conversation going that way.

Re: Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

#12
I've owned the Alexa since their first release. 80% of my request are the weather for the day. Ask for the weather forecast the next few days and she falls short. Other than that she's good for playing music on Spotify or Pandora, and occasionally I'll ask for the time.

I haven't tried Google Home, but the fact that it will read the first search result snippet as an answer seems light years ahead of Alexa.

Side-note: I just made the connection that Amazon bought Alexa.com the web analytics company a long time, and has named Echo's personal assistant Alexa. No coincidence, right? Although they never really mention it.

Re: Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

#13
This article far exaggerates the devices problems, at least as I've experienced it.

If someone shouts my name—Alex—across the apartment, it will activate Alexa

That's trivially fixable. You can rename her to "Echo", "Amazon", or "Computer".

sometimes Alexa will also be activated by arbitrary syllables in ordinary conversation. ... As I read this paragraph aloud to myself, her blue ring has already lit up several times

I've had this happen at random (i.e., when I didn't say her name accidentally) exactly once that I've noticed.

not only is Alexa incapable of looking up even basic facts

This is an exaggeration. By all accounts Google's device does better. But it's simply false that it can't look up "even basic facts". It's quite limited, but far from absolutely useless.

In my mind, Alexa's greatest flaw is in the design for its skill interface. You can't interact with her conversationally, because you always need to preface every command with its skill name, e.g., "Alexa, ask Spaceman what's the news today?" [1]. You must always remember these special names, and used them in this stilted fashion for all interactions. And making this worse is that Amazon insists that the interactions within each skill must be completely discoverable, so that they don't want to publish more than a couple of samples from each, encouraging you to experiment and discover yourself, a process I find tiresome and one guaranteed to leave at least some of the capabilities unknown.

[1] Shameless plug - this is a skill I wrote to give you news about scheduled rocket launches, near earth object passes, and lunar phase - https://sites.google.com/view/spacemanforalexa/

Re: Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

#14
While mine has never 'accidentally' ordered anything or yelled about internet disconnect, I do agree with the conclusion that it ends up being a very specific device. For me, that is a connected speaker with good sound that I can gently manage from across the room. Good enough for me.

On another note, my 2 year old son has always had a complicated relationship with 'her'. At one point, she red-ringed and would issue inscrutable messages after long periods of spinning white. This really sent him into a tailspin and it has taken several months for him to trust her again.

Re: Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

#15
post #3

what about it being the trojan horse of AI, to get Amazon's foot in the door for its eventual successor?

You need to put the payload inside the vehicle before you deliver it. Your chances of successfully installing it later fall asymptotically towards zero.

Re: Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

#18
One thing that I noticed that Alexa is helping me out in: Speaking up!

I have come to realize I mumble and talk low and cold heartless Alexa will remind me to speak up.

That being said, I never thought of my Echo as anything other than a 1st step towards something greater.

Re: Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

#19
I have an Amazon Echo in every room of my house, and I use it to control home automation, such as all of my lights, my ecobee thermostat, and my entire home theater (via a logitech harmony). I even use it to switch on and off my humidifier and space heater (and manage the temperature). My wife and I also use it to manage my shopping list (via the OurGroceries skill/app). I can use it to remote start my car and preheat or cool it down in the morning. I can even control my adjustable tempurpedic bed base, and have an IFTTT trigger which makes my bed vibrate whenever my amazon echo alarm goes off in the morning.

The possibilities are endless, and it's only going to get better.

Re: Alexa isn’t the future of AI–it’s a glorified radio clock, and stupid otherwise

#20
I don't get the fascination with this tech. The computer in Star Trek at least had a personality and intonation in its voice when it responded, even though it sounded like a synthesized voice.

The key here is intonation -- the infinitely varying way in which we vary the speed and pitch of our voices in response to another human being. It's very subtle and something Amaazon, Google and Siri have been unable to capture. And it makes interacting with these interfaces awkward and annoying to me. Either it needs to be perfect or it gets relegated to a "that's neat" category and promptly shut off.

When I talk to one of these things, it's downright painful. It's like speaking to a someone who's (at least interacting in english, I'm sure its true of other languages) primary language isn't english and they are just saying a series of words without any meaning behind them. You tolerate this (although its still annoying) because you're interacting with a human being on the other end, not some white or beige box.

The issue behind this of course is these devices will likely never be able to master intonation, because doing so would be a feat that would require clear understanding of subtle context, far greater than what current NLP technology can do, and may even require a general intelligence. It might be possible, I'm not up to date on the current state of the art but certainly wouldn't be computationally feasible in a consumer product any time soon.

Until then, I'll never buy or use one of these stupid voice interfaces. I can get the same task done on my phone or whatever UI without the annoyance.

Post reply on HN