Wonderful visualization. Also worrying. With each new iteration, I try to go over my settings and make sure my profile remains as private as it was in '05, but there so many fucking changes and settings, I might just quit one of these days.
You can deactivate your account when you sign off, then reactivate it whenever you want to do something with it. That way you are hopefully less vulnerable to their bugs and random privacy changes.
The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
11–20 of 28 posts
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#12Half the features on this graph didn't exist in 2005, for example: photos. There was basically no privacy initially, everyone at your school could see everything, which wasn't much.
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#13The acceleration is what worries me... What's next: July 2010 - SkyNet
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#14The idea is:
1) You take your data where you want
2) You control you privacy
3) Seamless integration with different installation running all around the world.
4) Open Source (So it can be peer reviewed)
5) Tools for migrating from facebook and other Social Networks
6) Dead simple and user friendly UI. Built for people who can not differentiate between facebook and readwriteweb
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#15That should be 'devolution'.
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#16I'm not sure how you could get traction, but aiming it directly at people who are disillusioned with facebook over privacy and stupid apps would be the way to go... position it as a "clean" and "sophisticated" alternative to facebook, and make it super-easy for people to control what information goes to whom.
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#17That should be 'devolution'.
Evolution has no direction, no intended goal.
"evolution can refer to any sort of progressive development"
whereas in the biological sense you are right.
Since this is not about biology I figure we can safely assume that a 'progressive development' is meant and the article linked very much supports that.
The word 'devolution' is probably not used properly here, but I tried to indicate that I don't think this is 'progress', but rather the opposite.
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#18I have been trying to come up with a design for a Open Social Network. Something you can host yourself or use from a "trusted" third party with the ability to seamlessly connect with each other. The idea is: 1) You take your data where you want 2) You control you privacy 3) Seamless integration with different installation running all around the world. 4) Open Source (So it can be peer reviewed) 5) Tools for migrating…
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#19I really am starting to think Facebook went through my Gmail contacts without me even authorizing it to do so. In the past hour, it's suggested three people I
1) Don't have any friends in common with 2) Never searched for on Facebook 3) Never contacted other than through Gmail and 4) never even worked with
One guy, I used to play Team Fortress Classic with, who only I've talked to through email showed up in my suggestions. Has anyone else experienced this?
Re: The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook
#20I've got a question. I really am starting to think Facebook went through my Gmail contacts without me even authorizing it to do so. In the past hour, it's suggested three people I 1) Don't have any friends in common with 2) Never searched for on Facebook 3) Never contacted other than through Gmail and 4) never even worked with One guy, I used to play Team Fortress Classic with, who only I've talked to through email s…
It also found many of my friends whom she had never even heard of---I had even defriended a couple of them. I'm thinking that it's also recommending based on cookies/session or IP address---perhaps their logic is that a person living with me likely knows many of the people whom I know.