Consultant-for-hire: "the propaganda is true; i found evidence" The claims are not believable on their face, given that it's a security firm hired by the DNC. They describe evidence, but it's hard to independently evaluate that evidence as a neutral third party. And even if they are true, and Russia did hack the DNC in order to influence the election? Then the american people had more evidence upon which to base thei…
Just because something is true doesn't mean that releasing it to the public is good. For instance, there were hacked documents released for some Congressional races that were expected to be close races where Democrats had an edge. These releases included the detailed campaign strategy documents of the Democratic candidates in those races. There was nothing in those releases showing any wrongdoing, or even hinting at…
Re: Cybersecurity firm finds evidence that Russian military unit was behind DNC hack
#11More information available for the public to make an informed decision seems like it's always a good thing. What's good for Democrats != what's good for the public.