Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recall reading somewhere many years ago that AWS randomise a, b, c etc per account. Otherwise people have a tendency to pick A and be done with it.
That's true - they loadbalance instance creation unless you specifically ask for an instance in a zone That doesn't apply here though. Instances that are already up are experiencing DNS resolution issues because the Amazon-provided DNS service (which is distinct from Route53) is failing
What you see as zone A is not what I see as zone A (maybe). When you sign up for an account, AWS assigns your zone A to one of the 3 available zones:
zone X (real) : your A (virtual) : my C (virtual)
zone Y (real) : your B (virtual) : my B (virtual)
zone Z (real) : your C (virtual) : my A (virtual)
That's why people see different outage characteristics between the zones.Edit: one of the few articles (other than HN comments) that explains it https://alestic.com/2009/07/ec2-availability-zones/