Discussion can be huge for engagement, and they have the reach and audience to set a new high watermark in this area.
Instead, you still can't even comment on most articles.
If anyone from NYT reads here I'd love to share some ideas.
11–18 of 18 posts
Discussion can be huge for engagement, and they have the reach and audience to set a new high watermark in this area.
Instead, you still can't even comment on most articles.
If anyone from NYT reads here I'd love to share some ideas.
They are off investing time/money in bleeding edge tech, yet they won't innovate or improve the community/commenting system. Discussion can be huge for engagement, and they have the reach and audience to set a new high watermark in this area. Instead, you still can't even comment on most articles. If anyone from NYT reads here I'd love to share some ideas.
It's the next generation community platform that the Times is working on right now.
Oh, well.
They are off investing time/money in bleeding edge tech, yet they won't innovate or improve the community/commenting system. Discussion can be huge for engagement, and they have the reach and audience to set a new high watermark in this area. Instead, you still can't even comment on most articles. If anyone from NYT reads here I'd love to share some ideas.
You should check out the coral project: https://coralproject.net/ It's the next generation community platform that the Times is working on right now.
They are off investing time/money in bleeding edge tech, yet they won't innovate or improve the community/commenting system. Discussion can be huge for engagement, and they have the reach and audience to set a new high watermark in this area. Instead, you still can't even comment on most articles. If anyone from NYT reads here I'd love to share some ideas.
http://www.nytco.com/the-times-is-partnering-with-jigsaw-to-...
https://medium.com/jigsaw/new-york-times-and-jigsaw-partner-...
FWIW, the 360 videos aren't working on Debian using Firefox-ESR (which is 45.4.0). :( I'm getting the error "Your browser doesn't support 360 videos."
I tried the NYT video on iOS Safari and while it worked, it was a bad experience. When swiping up to look up and down, the whole page scrolled instead of the video pitching up/down. The video was choppy too. I'm impressed they got it working on iOS Safari though. Apple would prefer you repeat the phrase "there's an app for that", and it's no surprise their browser well short of its potential for handling such things.