Live data from Hacker News

Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

github.com

11–20 of 222 posts

Re: Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

#11

Bitwarden is a password manager? And their engineer is asking, after being told a hint of serious security issues in their framework, to just forget about it and let them publish? That's an interesting approach.

It is strange. On the other hand there's something suspicious here. Some things clearly aren't being communicated properly.

Re: Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

#12

Bitwarden is a password manager? And their engineer is asking, after being told a hint of serious security issues in their framework, to just forget about it and let them publish? That's an interesting approach.

No, the engineer is asking for more information so that he can determine if the application is truly affected by some unpublished Angular vulnerability or if Mozilla is just being too aggressive with their ban hammer because someone said "Angular 1.x was no longer being officially supported", which is false.

Re: Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

#13
post #6

So someone found some sort of vulnerability in Angular 1, told Mozilla about it, but told them not to tell the Angular team? What is going on here?

It's possible that the vulnerability only effects Angular running in Firefox addons, and not the general web. Mozilla takes an aggressive stance on what they allow in vetted browser extensions, as they should.

JS in addons runs in a different, more privileged environment than normal web pages, and isn't restricted by things like same-origin (although this is improving with Firefox's new extension APIs). Any project the size of Angular is bound to have security issues when run outside of the environment it was designed for.

Re: Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

#14
post #3

> My information is that Google stopped supporting angular 1.x months ago. It is now a community driven project. I totally missed this - was there a notice of this posted somewhere?

Yeah that doesn't sound true at all.

Was recently at an angular conference -- they said they would continue to support it until the _majority_ of the community had made the switch. That's so far from happening, I imagine they'll be supporting it for years.

Re: Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

#15
For all we know Mozilla is complicit in the black market sale of this vuln by the mystery security researcher.

Given Angular 1's popularity, Mozilla has a moral obligation to responsibly disclose this bug to the Angular team and let them determine if its unsolvable or not. Hinting at its existence is one of the worst things they could have done since it will simply give other blackhats motivation to find this vuln while Angular team is not aware of it.

Re: Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

#17
If there is some permutation of JavaScript statements (library or otherwise) that displays a security vulnerability for the user, isn't that the browser's fault and not the application's? And isn't library detection just a hacky substitute for an actual fix of said fault?

Re: Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

#18
post #10
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is possible that the researcher also secretly shared the results with Google, but then nothing happened?

As claimed in the comments, Angular 1 is now community driven instead of officially supported by Google.

the following comment refutes that comment and says Angular 1.x is still supported by Google.

Re: Angular 1.x Banned from Firefox Addons

#20
post #15

For all we know Mozilla is complicit in the black market sale of this vuln by the mystery security researcher. Given Angular 1's popularity, Mozilla has a moral obligation to responsibly disclose this bug to the Angular team and let them determine if its unsolvable or not. Hinting at its existence is one of the worst things they could have done since it will simply give other blackhats motivation to find this vuln wh…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN