FYI: "Bidders must have a bank account in Singapore to receive payment for work done."
I looked for that on the site and didn't find it. Would you mind linking the page with this statement? Thanks.
Open Source Micro-Purchasing Forked in Singapore
11–14 of 14 posts
Re: Open Source Micro-Purchasing Forked in Singapore
#12And btw it would be very interesting if anybody from the US would like to write a little bit about the role of 18F - I am not sure that I understand things right, but it seems to be a very interesting concept of governmental IT services. How is this agency perceived? How does it work out in practice? How are things coordinated? Anything would be appreciated! Thanks!
Hello! Happy to answer any questions you have about 18F. The basics: we're an office of federal employees inside the General Services Administration that helps other federal agencies improve how they build, buy, and share technology. Other agencies have to pay us for our work, so we operate in a similar way to a private business. You can see a summary of the types of things we ship (with examples) here https://18f.gs…
Thanks for your answer!
I am just looking at this from the viewpoint of an interested citizen (in Europe) and try to compare with how things work here. Currently I suspect we are heavily missing something like 18F.
Do you know what brought 18F into existence? Was this an administrative initiative? Was there big resistence to start that? I am interested in some of the "meta" behind how all that happened.
Also: are there some laws involved?
I guess I could contact your press office, however, maybe you would like to post some interesting links to stories that certainly went unnoticed on the other side of the ocean.
Things like 18F show a very interesting aspect of USA that does not fit into the usual "ultra-capitalist" stereotypes that are painted in the european media much too often. Especially the commitment to OS is extraordinary interesting!
Thanks for your attention!
Re: Open Source Micro-Purchasing Forked in Singapore
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hello! Happy to answer any questions you have about 18F. The basics: we're an office of federal employees inside the General Services Administration that helps other federal agencies improve how they build, buy, and share technology. Other agencies have to pay us for our work, so we operate in a similar way to a private business. You can see a summary of the types of things we ship (with examples) here https://18f.gs…
Thanks for your answer! I am just looking at this from the viewpoint of an interested citizen (in Europe) and try to compare with how things work here. Currently I suspect we are heavily missing something like 18F. Do you know what brought 18F into existence? Was this an administrative initiative? Was there big resistence to start that? I am interested in some of the "meta" behind how all that happened. Also: are the…
18F came out of the Presidential Innovation Fellowship (pif.gov) when some fellows wanted to stick around and continue their public service. So they created 18F as a more permanent home that could house larger projects and hire people for longer tours of duty. It's a sister office to the U.S. Digital Service (which is in the White House) but it's primarily a GSA initiative.
There aren't specific laws involved. We aren't funded by Congress, but instead by an investment from GSA and fees from our partner agencies.
Here's one of the larger stories about the digital services movement in the U.S., including the U.S. Digital Service and 18F. https://www.fastcompany.com/3046756/obama-and-his-geeks
We've taken heavy influence from the GDS team in the UK, and Estonia is also a leader in digital government. https://18f.gsa.gov/2015/06/17/what-estonia-can-teach-us-abo...