Live data from Hacker News

Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

priceonomics.com

11–20 of 161 posts

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#11
post #4

It is not famous people, it is Hillary Clinton. As the article says, famous people get paid less than 50.000. Why does Hillary gets paid five times that amount: 1-Because the Clintons already repealed Glass–Steagall Act removing controls on the financial industry and giving them billions in the process. Even a million is nothing compared to the billions they have received and the billions they will receive from Clint…

No, it is famous people in general.

Scott Adams, the Dilbert cartoonist, has openly written about being paid well over 100k per speech, several times a year. You can Google this. George W. Bush charges, on average, 150k per speech. A-List and B-List celebrities can easily get well in the six, occasionally in the seven figures for a public appearance of this sort. Rutgers University even paid Snooki about 32k for a commencement speech, if you remember this delightfully controversial event.

You have to keep in mind that for such events, the speaker usually does not constitute the majority of expenses. Organizing meals, booking a venue, and other logistics are not cheap already. Above all, such events are mostly for purposes of showing off or building morale: organizers want attendants (usually employees) to feel good about where they work. Just like with other kinds of corporate-level showing off, there's a big budget.

If anything, I think Hillary Clinton is paid surprisingly little for her public appearances (even though they do happen in great quantity).

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#12
post #4

It is not famous people, it is Hillary Clinton. As the article says, famous people get paid less than 50.000. Why does Hillary gets paid five times that amount: 1-Because the Clintons already repealed Glass–Steagall Act removing controls on the financial industry and giving them billions in the process. Even a million is nothing compared to the billions they have received and the billions they will receive from Clint…

The top section of people there is the greater than $50k section, not less than $50k.

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#13
post #4

It is not famous people, it is Hillary Clinton. As the article says, famous people get paid less than 50.000. Why does Hillary gets paid five times that amount: 1-Because the Clintons already repealed Glass–Steagall Act removing controls on the financial industry and giving them billions in the process. Even a million is nothing compared to the billions they have received and the billions they will receive from Clint…

EDIT: Oh fUCK .. I aM gEtTiNg dOwNvOtEd .. love u all ..

It's a pity that this happens in plain sight and the world still goes on ...

It's like all of us are stuck in our little microcosm, and we don't give a damn about what happens to the nation as a whole. People in power take advantage of this neglect and by the time common man realizes this, it too late, almost always ...

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#14
post #13
post #4

It is not famous people, it is Hillary Clinton. As the article says, famous people get paid less than 50.000. Why does Hillary gets paid five times that amount: 1-Because the Clintons already repealed Glass–Steagall Act removing controls on the financial industry and giving them billions in the process. Even a million is nothing compared to the billions they have received and the billions they will receive from Clint…

EDIT: Oh fUCK .. I aM gEtTiNg dOwNvOtEd .. love u all .. It's a pity that this happens in plain sight and the world still goes on ... It's like all of us are stuck in our little microcosm, and we don't give a damn about what happens to the nation as a whole. People in power take advantage of this neglect and by the time common man realizes this, it too late, almost always ...

[deleted]

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most of the people listed in this article aren't politicians, and so can't enact any laws. And even when they are politicians, it looks like they are almost always retired politicians, who can't enact any laws. Some of them are even counter-establishment figures like satirists and even hackers (in the security sense). Hillary Clinton is a prominent example, but the article's explanation is that she is invited as a re…

> she is invited as a retired secretary of state, as other retired secretaries of state have been, rather than as a current presidential candidate Did she leave the part of her that was a future (at the time) presidential candidate at home?

> That seems reasonable?

Yes it does to me. If they invite many former secretaries of state it seems reasonable to invite this one. Who cares what she's currently working on if that's not why she was invited? The article even says she hardly mentioned her candidacy.

If you're desperate to get worked up about this I can see where you would find the problem, but I think a charitable interpretation is a former secretary of state was invited to talk like many others were.

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#16
post #4

It is not famous people, it is Hillary Clinton. As the article says, famous people get paid less than 50.000. Why does Hillary gets paid five times that amount: 1-Because the Clintons already repealed Glass–Steagall Act removing controls on the financial industry and giving them billions in the process. Even a million is nothing compared to the billions they have received and the billions they will receive from Clint…

So basically lobbying, but in a more discreet, sinister, difficult to trace form.

Lessig would call it corruption.

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> she is invited as a retired secretary of state, as other retired secretaries of state have been, rather than as a current presidential candidate Did she leave the part of her that was a future (at the time) presidential candidate at home?

> That seems reasonable? Yes it does to me. If they invite many former secretaries of state it seems reasonable to invite this one. Who cares what she's currently working on if that's not why she was invited? The article even says she hardly mentioned her candidacy. If you're desperate to get worked up about this I can see where you would find the problem, but I think a charitable interpretation is a former secretary…

> a charitable interpretation

Indeed.

If you trust her, you may not see a problem, but if you don't trust her, it's easy to argue this is disguised bribery.

There's a huge difference between a former secretary of state with no prospects of power in the future and someone everyone knew would run for President in a few years.

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#18
post #4

It is not famous people, it is Hillary Clinton. As the article says, famous people get paid less than 50.000. Why does Hillary gets paid five times that amount: 1-Because the Clintons already repealed Glass–Steagall Act removing controls on the financial industry and giving them billions in the process. Even a million is nothing compared to the billions they have received and the billions they will receive from Clint…

Please don't post political diatribes to HN. They tend to drown out other, more interesting discussions.

"Please avoid introducing classic flamewar topics unless you have something genuinely new to say about them."

Re: Why Do Famous People Get Paid $250k to Give a Speech?

#19
The tree has entered my hands, The sap has ascended my arms, The tree has grown in my breast- Downward, The branches grow out of me, like arms.

Tree you are, Moss you are, You are violets with wind above them. A child - so high - you are, And all this is folly to the world.

Post reply on HN