Live data from Hacker News

Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

nytimes.com

11–20 of 27 posts

Re: Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

#11
post #4

Ugh, I hate induction for cooking. We have one at home (UK) and it is a pain - you have to be on the ball all the time when making a meal. I prefer gas or standard electric hobs personally; more fine grained control and actually a little more predictable in my experience.

Can you explain why you have to be on the ball all the time?

Re: Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

#12
I'd like to nomminate the article for the "stupid metaphor of the year" award, though. I mean, why would I want to by a stove that only allows me to cook meels tested and approved by as well as procured through the stove manufactuer? Or what is the character sequence "iPad of the kitchen" meant to signify?

Re: Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

#13
post #4

Ugh, I hate induction for cooking. We have one at home (UK) and it is a pain - you have to be on the ball all the time when making a meal. I prefer gas or standard electric hobs personally; more fine grained control and actually a little more predictable in my experience.

Can you explain why you have to be on the ball all the time?

It heats faster for one thing - I used to be able flick on the gas at my Uni flat and dump something into it then get distracted for a few minutes chopping/cutting etc.

Re: Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

#15
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you explain why you have to be on the ball all the time?

It heats faster for one thing - I used to be able flick on the gas at my Uni flat and dump something into it then get distracted for a few minutes chopping/cutting etc.

Of course, that is also the advantage. If you want to get a nice sear on a meat dish or quickly boil water, you don't have to wait as long for the pan/pot to heat up.

Re: Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

#16
post #9

It's all fun and games until somebody sticks their hand in the field while wearing a steel watch.

Actually, I have an RFID tag implanted in my hand, and I was rather worried that it would blow up or something when I would put my hand on our stove. Turns out it's no problem at all, I have tried everything possible to get a tag to explode, break, get warm or even just stop working, but I haven't been able to find a way.

Stupid question, why do you have an RFID tag in your hand?

Re: Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

#17
post #16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually, I have an RFID tag implanted in my hand, and I was rather worried that it would blow up or something when I would put my hand on our stove. Turns out it's no problem at all, I have tried everything possible to get a tag to explode, break, get warm or even just stop working, but I haven't been able to find a way.

Stupid question, why do you have an RFID tag in your hand?

Mostly for the body hack value of it, at this moment I only use it to log on to my computer. There's a book out there ('RFID toys') that describes how it could be used to unlock/start a car or unlock a door. Maybe if I ever have a spare weekend or two (heh) I'll make something like a 'hidden' safe, a seemingly normal wall that springs open when I wave my hand past it. Maybe put a gun safe in there or something. If I ever build another house for myself I will try to put some hidden areas like that in it.

Overall and right now it's of limited practical value. Still makes for a cool story and discussion starter on transhumanism.

Re: Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

#19
Finally something I can comment on, as I like to cook, and I upgraded to induction about a year ago.

Upside: It's like cooking with gas, without the risk of fire. It looks slick. If you get a good and powerful model, the install footprint is small and cooking on it is very reproducable... (setting 7 on burner 3 with this pan is always the same). You can also get maintain lower temperatures than you can with other stovetops, negating the need in some cases for a double-boiler and making it easy to keep food warm - there are a plethora of other technical coolies too - like how as soon as I lift up the pan to dump the pasta, the power to the element shuts of. It's more efficient. The cat can walk on it and even though he hits the buttons, he can't turn it on - elements are reactive, they won't activate if they don't sense enough ferrous material above them.

Downside: It's ceramic. Don't drop stuff on it. Downside: It's ceramic, if you like to sautee stuff by lifting up the pan and/or sliding the pan around, it will just scratch up your cooktop.

A professional restaurant, for this reason, would probably benefit from both gas and induction at the same time.

Re: Is Induction Cooking Ready to Go Mainstream?

#20

It's all fun and games until somebody sticks their hand in the field while wearing a steel watch.

Very difficult to do - the induction element won't start until a significant (pan-sized) amount of ferrous material is very close to the cooktop, and shuts off the moment it's lifted away - there isn't enough room to get your wrist in there - and it's doubtful that your watch by itself, even if it was made of iron, would be enough to trigger the sensors on the element and let the element turn on..

Safety features and all that - they thought of that already.

Rings, watches - all safe.

Post reply on HN