Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
11–20 of 24 posts
Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#12Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#13Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#14Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#15Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#16The only ones I am willing to wager on are corporate infrastructure related software and domain specific software (like CAD tools, movie animation tools etc). For similar legacy reasons, I am willing to add Linux derivatives and GNU C compiler, but won't wager on them.
Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#17vim, emacs, linux, windows, mac os x, nethack (plus a whole stack of programming languages like C).
Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#18Looking at what's already been around for >10 years: vim, emacs, linux, windows, mac os x, nethack (plus a whole stack of programming languages like C).
Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#19Re: Assume only 10% of the current software will be relevant after 10 years
#20The only ones I am willing to wager on are corporate infrastructure related software and domain specific software (like CAD tools, movie animation tools etc). For similar legacy reasons, I am willing to add Linux derivatives and GNU C compiler, but won't wager on them.
Thanks to Minecraft, I expect a whole new batch of Java developers over the next several years.