So what would be a use case for using ELBs now? Seems like ALBs do everything ELBs do, but with websocket and HTTP/2 support.
If your security requirements are such that AWS can't terminate TLS would be one reason.
AWS Application Load Balancer
11–20 of 140 posts
Re: AWS Application Load Balancer
#12> 25 connections/second with a 2 KB certificate, 3,000 active connections, and 2.22 Mbps of data transfer or
>5 connections/second with a 4 KB certificate, 3,000 active connective, and 2.22 Mbps of data transfer.
"2KB certificate" and "4KB certificate"? Is this supposed to read "2048 bit RSA" and "4096 bit RSA"?
Re: AWS Application Load Balancer
#13This is very good.
Recently my workflow has been ELB -> NGINX -> Cluster.
Nginx was a cluster of machines that did routing based on rules into the ec2 machines. Now that the AELB has some of those capabilities it's time to evaluate it.
Re: AWS Application Load Balancer
#14This is definitely nicer than having to create subdomains for microservices and mapping each subdomain url to its own Elastic Loaad Balancer + Elastic Beanstalk instance. But I have already gone down this path so I am unlikely to use AWS Application Load balancer. I wish I had this option a year ago.
Re: AWS Application Load Balancer
#15Re: AWS Application Load Balancer
#16Do ALBs support more than a single SSL certificate?
Re: AWS Application Load Balancer
#17As a heavy ECS user, all I can say is thank you, finally!
Re: AWS Application Load Balancer
#18> 25 connections/second with a 2 KB certificate, 3,000 active connections, and 2.22 Mbps of data transfer or >5 connections/second with a 4 KB certificate, 3,000 active connective, and 2.22 Mbps of data transfer. "2KB certificate" and "4KB certificate"? Is this supposed to read "2048 bit RSA" and "4096 bit RSA"?
Most likely, yes.