There are no nightmares in physics and science. There is only further intrigue.
[deleted]
The LHC “nightmare scenario” has come true
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: The LHC “nightmare scenario” has come true
#12Over the years I was slowly beginning to become convinced that the abstractions of relativistic model are just not compatible with all other models we have. Not negating the correctness of it's results, but I kinda think that it should be redefined so it conforms better with the rest of the models. Alas, it has become de facto a state religion and any attempts at discussion about it end up with being laughed at
Re: The LHC “nightmare scenario” has come true
#13Isn't this really the "dream" scenario?? The current state is that we have evidence that the current theories are not correct which leaves a gap for new theories to fill. Sounds like an exciting area to be working in right now if you ask me (unfortunately, I'm not!).
We know that the current theories aren't correct anyway. Or more accurately, they are correct only in low-energy conditions, and can't say anything about high-energy conditions. This is "nightmare scenario" because we knew that the theories aren't correct, but we hoped for some results that would guide and inspire new theories. Either way we know that we aren't done yet, but the current state is like being in a featu…
...so we should expect a period of wild speculation in physics with some fairly interesting experimentation to prove (or falsify) those theories.
(I'm not a physicist), but is it possible to almost automate some of the discovery process to attempt to turn up new leads? (or is the search-space too large for this to be reasonable?).
Re: The LHC “nightmare scenario” has come true
#14The true nightmare scenario will become true when advancing from plateau of scientific advancements will become too hard for human minds. Maybe it's impossible for people to comprehend or navigate in ideas located above some level of complexity, the same way most animals can't notice themselves in a mirror. So far our progress has been quite impressive, but what if there's some sort of human "Moore's Law" for science, where further advancements without AI will be close to impossible?
Re: The LHC “nightmare scenario” has come true
#15Also last month on her blog: Why the LHC is such a disappointment: A delusion by name “naturalness”.
http://backreaction.blogspot.com.au/2016/07/why-lhc-is-such-...
Re: The LHC “nightmare scenario” has come true
#16Isn't this really the "dream" scenario?? The current state is that we have evidence that the current theories are not correct which leaves a gap for new theories to fill. Sounds like an exciting area to be working in right now if you ask me (unfortunately, I'm not!).
It's a nightmare because the last 50 years of science have led to a dead end, with no clue as to the next path to take.
Maybe the new physics will allow anti-gravity sneakers? Not such a nightmare after all...
Re: The LHC “nightmare scenario” has come true
#17Over the years I was slowly beginning to become convinced that the abstractions of relativistic model are just not compatible with all other models we have. Not negating the correctness of it's results, but I kinda think that it should be redefined so it conforms better with the rest of the models. Alas, it has become de facto a state religion and any attempts at discussion about it end up with being laughed at
Are you talking about special relativity or general relativity?
Special relativity and quantum mechanics were joined by Dirac in 1928 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation
General relativity is apparently more difficult, and we don't have a quantum version yet.