This sounds like a horrible idea.
SSH with Facebook Auth
11–18 of 18 posts
Re: SSH with Facebook Auth
#12Re: SSH with Facebook Auth
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still. The idea that it is a service means that you are still handing over indirect control.
Hey, one of the founders of ScaleFT here. You're absolutely right that when you're using ScaleFT you're trusting both us (as operators of the CA) and your identity provider (in this case Facebook, but we have a bunch of other options more suitable for most businesses). Handing over control isn't necessarily a bad thing. For example, I trust Google to operate a secure and reliable email service much more than I trust…
Hopefully, Google would soon integrate features that let it auto-reply to your incoming messages. It can be trusted more, after all.
Re: SSH with Facebook Auth
#14Re: SSH with Facebook Auth
#15Re: SSH with Facebook Auth
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Still. The idea that it is a service means that you are still handing over indirect control.
Hey, one of the founders of ScaleFT here. You're absolutely right that when you're using ScaleFT you're trusting both us (as operators of the CA) and your identity provider (in this case Facebook, but we have a bunch of other options more suitable for most businesses). Handing over control isn't necessarily a bad thing. For example, I trust Google to operate a secure and reliable email service much more than I trust…
This sentence has got nothing to do with trust. You believe (maybe rightly so) that Gmail is more secure and reliable than any solution that can be cobbled-up individually.
Simply replacing "believe" with "trust" doesn't really mean the same though. English is a funny language. But then again that's what you probably meant when you said "Trust is a complex thing". Hmmmm... :)
Re: SSH with Facebook Auth
#17Re: SSH with Facebook Auth
#18If this becomes popular, I will build a new internet.