Live data from Hacker News

Care about search privacy? Duck Duck Go no longer logs IPs.

gabrielweinberg.com

11–20 of 99 posts

Re: Care about search privacy? Duck Duck Go no longer logs IPs.

#13
post #2

This is definitely a killer niche to fill given the current privacy conscious climate [around here]. Kudos.

"current privacy conscious climate" sounds like something Fox News would use. Just like we were all subjected to years of "...in these uncertain times." after 9/11.

And as said, this is probably the least privacy conscious the internet has ever been. Most people just don't care (They're also the ones clicking on ads).

Re: Care about search privacy? Duck Duck Go no longer logs IPs.

#14

He does log the browser string. The EFF's panopticlick project shows that this is a way to identify a user surprisingly uniquely.

Wow, really? Any references? I'd consider ditching them. They're not doing much for me anyway.

Re: Care about search privacy? Duck Duck Go no longer logs IPs.

#15

He does log the browser string. The EFF's panopticlick project shows that this is a way to identify a user surprisingly uniquely.

Wow, really? Any references? I'd consider ditching them. They're not doing much for me anyway.

https://panopticlick.eff.org/

Re: Care about search privacy? Duck Duck Go no longer logs IPs.

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wow, really? Any references? I'd consider ditching them. They're not doing much for me anyway.

https://panopticlick.eff.org/

Right, that's tracking everything the browser outputs, not just the user agent, which is maybe 1% of the full string.

Re: Care about search privacy? Duck Duck Go no longer logs IPs.

#18
post #10
post #2

This is definitely a killer niche to fill given the current privacy conscious climate [around here]. Kudos.

"Privacy conscious climate"? Are we using the same Internet? (The one with Twitter, Facebook, Foursquare, etc...)

That's just the internet you know about. :)

Re: Care about search privacy? Duck Duck Go no longer logs IPs.

#20

He does log the browser string. The EFF's panopticlick project shows that this is a way to identify a user surprisingly uniquely.

Wow, really? Any references? I'd consider ditching them. They're not doing much for me anyway.

If you're only logging the info provided in the GET request you only have less than 20 "bits of identifying information". They also use some Javascript to collect additional information, which increases the available information quite a bit.
Post reply on HN