Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not in so many words--but then again, there is a lot of dog-whistling going on, intentionally or not. I really hate to link to some of these, but Red State does a decent summation of the "loopholes" as they apply to the executive actions took in January of this year ( http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2016/01/05/obamas-executive... ). It's not just the adoption of simple measures, though. There is a lot of resistance…
"I really hate to link to some of these" "Loathe as I am to mention them," You know, just don't do that if you really dislike those publications so much. "The entire posturing of gun control has been to either fear-monger or to smear" No fear mongering is required. Simple data mongering is enough http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/13/health/mass-shootings-in-ameri...
As for the data mongering, your link notes that (ignoring gang violence), there have been only 3, not 136, shootings this year. It's a bit curious that such a large order of magnitude change can be had by changing the definition slightly--and yet, it's nearly always the more dramatic number reported and reported as an imminent threat!