I think the biggest problem right now is the lack of standardization of formats. I know that when I was writing sections in our VMM we didn't really think about VM formats. The thing is that your data representation tends to be heavily influenced by the VMM design and therefore VMMs with different designs tend to have different data formats. Hypothetically it's possible to develop a standardized format, but we'll see…
VMWare's open virtualization format is making progress on this front: http://www.vmware.com/appliances/getting-started/learn/ovf.h...
Amazon auctions computing power: Clouds under the hammer
11–16 of 16 posts
Re: Amazon auctions computing power: Clouds under the hammer
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
VMWare's open virtualization format is making progress on this front: http://www.vmware.com/appliances/getting-started/learn/ovf.h...
Not really. The fact that they have a standard that only they use doesn't mean all that much. When Xen or KVM adopt it then I may call that progress.
Re: Amazon auctions computing power: Clouds under the hammer
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really. The fact that they have a standard that only they use doesn't mean all that much. When Xen or KVM adopt it then I may call that progress.
XenServer (the version from Citrix/XenSource) has the ability to convert OVF; natively, they use the Microsoft-derived VHD format.
Re: Amazon auctions computing power: Clouds under the hammer
#14Meta-point: I'm surprised at how accurate this article was in terms of the way it explained the concepts and the jargon. It seems to be rare in non-tech publications.
Re: Amazon auctions computing power: Clouds under the hammer
#15Re: Amazon auctions computing power: Clouds under the hammer
#16Mass power outages can be huge disasters. Will the future bring with it 'mass computing outages'? How will we handle that?