Well, it's less about your 'free will' and more about one's inability to generate a random number. I'm not going to take the time to test it, but if you flipped a coin before each key press, this algorithm would eventually get to 50% accuracy. But in the short term it would probably be <50%, because it assumes it won't actually get random input.
Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
11–20 of 240 posts
Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
#12I am stuck at around 0.76. I think its flawed - Whatever I press it never changes by more than 1% How can the prediction for 'f' be 0.764 and for 'd' be 0.763 - they don't add up to 1.
Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
#13Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
#14I am stuck at around 0.76. I think its flawed - Whatever I press it never changes by more than 1% How can the prediction for 'f' be 0.764 and for 'd' be 0.763 - they don't add up to 1.
It's making a (hidden) prediction about what key you'll press, and it's displaying the number of times it was correct over all your key presses.
So, the more you've pressed the keys, the less each successive press will change it's overall success rate.
Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
#150.375 -- I guess I'm not perfectly random.
Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
#16Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
#170.375 -- I guess I'm not perfectly random.
Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
#18Re: Test your “free will” at the Aaronson Oracle
#19I am stuck at around 0.76. I think its flawed - Whatever I press it never changes by more than 1% How can the prediction for 'f' be 0.764 and for 'd' be 0.763 - they don't add up to 1.