Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: MixcloudAds, if we white-label it would you use it?

news.ycombinator.com

11–16 of 16 posts

Re: Ask HN: MixcloudAds, if we white-label it would you use it?

#11
post #10
post #3

http://isocket.com They've powered TechCrunch's ads since last May. http://www.crunchbase.com/company/isocket

Also look into openx. Community version and hosted version.

We use it for some other ads, and its the sole reason why decided to make our own, its the definition of bad ui, and a real pain to use.

Re: Ask HN: MixcloudAds, if we white-label it would you use it?

#13
post #12

Presently, on the webpage of mixcloud, there's an ad that repeat itself horizontally (Like a tile). That's the new kind of bug you can have if people automatically upload a wrong sized image ;) But I like the idea and I'm sure you can fix that bug quite easily.

yeah we only just spotted that one, fixing it now :) Always amazed by the new ways users find to break stuff. But that one we should have caught.

Re: Ask HN: MixcloudAds, if we white-label it would you use it?

#14
post #9
post #3

http://isocket.com They've powered TechCrunch's ads since last May. http://www.crunchbase.com/company/isocket

It looks like the majority of TC is being run through Google Ad Manager with lots of inventory going to them (notice all the google ads). I don't see iSocket's ad script anywhere on their page, maybe they interface to Google Ad Manager?

John here, Founder of isocket.

Part of the "open" approach we're taking is not forcing publishers to use our ad server if they don't want to. We have one, but some publishers (like TechCrunch) use our plugins with other ad servers like GAM.

So you won't see our tags on TechCrunch's page, but many of those ads were purchased through our system.

Cheers,

Re: Ask HN: MixcloudAds, if we white-label it would you use it?

#15
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or do they sell the excess inventory you dont to a larger ad network??

That would make sense - I've seen some strange ads on TechCrunch that could be explained by that.

John here, Founder of isocket.

Sorry guys, but you'll have to blame the strange ads on Google =)

Publishers on isocket can put another ad network's code in as a default setting - so that when their ad space isn't sold directly, it will default to AdSense / whatever.

We do not arbitrage or sell your unused inventory for our benefit.

In terms of our business model - yes, we're actually commission-free. It's a flat monthly fee. Sorry to do this to ya, but we haven't publicly announced what the pricing is yet.

Cheers

Re: Ask HN: MixcloudAds, if we white-label it would you use it?

#16
This sounds like something that would go high up on our evaluation list for the company I work for -- for us, there's a big space between our bread-and-butter high end advertisers and the remnant networks filled with advertisers that would like to make sub $5k buys but take as much or more effort than advertisers on the other side of that line.

That said, a pricing model as a % of revenue would probably be less attractive than a cost based on some function of resource utilization -- we don't necessarily need to give you incentives to figure out how to max our revenue; let us worry about optimizing our pricing and maximizing sales; you focus on providing us a kickass product.

Also, ideally we'd be able to traffic ads sold via self-serve into our existing inventory (i.e., not a separate unit or zone) AND avoid overselling impressions we don't have (e.g., we frequently "sell out" of certain geotargeted metro areas) -- so it'd probably be best if it worked in tandem with our ad serving software (currently Google Ad Manager/DFP).

Post reply on HN