I wish there was a way to get rid of these bullshit jobs. Also, I wish there was a way to make entertainment business such as singing, acting, and sports much much less profitable.
Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
11–20 of 66 posts
Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#12Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#13I wish there was a way to get rid of these bullshit jobs. Also, I wish there was a way to make entertainment business such as singing, acting, and sports much much less profitable.
Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#14I wish there was a way to get rid of these bullshit jobs. Also, I wish there was a way to make entertainment business such as singing, acting, and sports much much less profitable.
Bankers? Or garbage removers?
I suspect the first will be around for a while and there are plenty of people working on autonomous garbage removal trucks. The crew on those trucks has gone from 4 to 3 to 2 and now in plenty of cases it is only 1, the driver and a robotic arm to empty the containers into the back of the truck.
That last person is a bigger step than the previous ones but with all the automated driving research going on I don't think it will be long before that last person too will be laid off.
Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#15Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#16> Nearly a century ago, economist John Maynard Keynes famously predicted that we would work fifteen-hour weeks by the year 2030 In 1930, when Keynes predicted the 15 hour work week, the average American earned $1,368/year which is roughly $19,500/year in todays dollars. 19500/52 = $375/week. In 1930, in manufacturing, the average person worked 50.6 hours per week. ( https://eh.net/encyclopedia/hours-of-work-in-u-s-hi…
There are more expenses involved in just getting by now. Mortgages (and I suspect rents) are well above historical price to income ratios. Dual incomes are a necessity for most families. That often means two cars are a necessity. And childcare costs...
I don't have the time to look it up now, but I believe Elizabeth Warren has a well known talk floating around the internet that deals with the issue of debt and how close many American families are to financial disaster. In that talk there's a great breakdown of the shifting nature of expenses.
Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#17And yet, they are treated as the lowest employees there, well, most are not even employees, outsourced three or four levels removed as a cost to be cut to the cheapest provider, damn the consequences.
Society has some warped views sometimes.
Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#18http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/24/news/economy/trash-workers-h... Some garbagemen do make $100000, more than some bankers (and some software engineers), as they rightly should, as described in this article.
Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#19Re: Why Garbagemen Should Earn More Than Bankers
#20One of the most important jobs in a hospital, is the cleaner. To help prevent the spread of infections like MRSI, to help keep outbreaks of vomiting virus under control, and help reduce the number of admitted and post procedure patients dying as a direct result of infection acquired in the hospital itself. And yet, they are treated as the lowest employees there, well, most are not even employees, outsourced three or…