Live data from Hacker News

EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

reuters.com

11–20 of 121 posts

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#11

What about Apple?

What about them? I don't think you understand the factors that are required for antitrust consideration. Android is like 80% of the market in Europe- you really think Apple is at all in the same foothold there?

The other difference is about enforcing manufacturers, which in Apple's case is Apple themselves...

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#12
post #4

Totally implausible scenario, but what would happen if Google were to say "to hell with this" and just completely pull out of the EU? Like full-stop, nothing Google touching the EU. Would there be riots? Would governments try to force Google back? Like, are they so essential to digital life that a complete withdrawal would cause some amount of chaos? And if that's the case, isn't an antitrust suit a bit disingenuous?…

People would switch to Windows Phones, which are fairly popular in Eastern Europe.

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#13
The best possible outcome I could see from something like this is the opening up of the Play Store ecosystem to third party Android forks.

The contention is over Google licensing Android branding and its proprietary apps running on top of the AOSP and requiring them all be shipped together. The problem isn't the OS itself, it is the Play Store hegemony and the fact you cannot reasonably ship an Android phone without it - nobody would buy it. But the store is a proprietary and effectively closed app ecosystem completely under Google's control, thus the issue of monopoly exploitation.

At least, I hope. If they are seriously considering the whole OS as a trust issue that is insane. Anyone can fork or reuse the component parts below the Google app layer with the Apache 2 license. There are even projects like http://www.shashlik.io/ to run Android apps natively on other systems. The only part of the Android ecosystem that in any way really violates user freedoms (besides the proprietary POS blobs every phone manufacturer shoves into a forked Linux kernel with oodles of GPL violations) is the Google apps themselves, but you can always pull a Cyanogenmod and ship a phone without those apps installed.

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#15

What about Apple?

they don't allow any other browser engines on iOS

Apple's market share in Europe is so laughable they literally can do whatever they want, but not allowing other browser engines on iOS is certainly not grounds for an antitrust lawsuit.

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#16
post #13

The best possible outcome I could see from something like this is the opening up of the Play Store ecosystem to third party Android forks. The contention is over Google licensing Android branding and its proprietary apps running on top of the AOSP and requiring them all be shipped together. The problem isn't the OS itself, it is the Play Store hegemony and the fact you cannot reasonably ship an Android phone without…

>. The problem isn't the OS itself, it is the Play Store hegemony and the fact you cannot reasonably ship an Android phone without it - nobody would buy it.

isn't this what amazon does?

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#17
post #16
post #13

The best possible outcome I could see from something like this is the opening up of the Play Store ecosystem to third party Android forks. The contention is over Google licensing Android branding and its proprietary apps running on top of the AOSP and requiring them all be shipped together. The problem isn't the OS itself, it is the Play Store hegemony and the fact you cannot reasonably ship an Android phone without…

>. The problem isn't the OS itself, it is the Play Store hegemony and the fact you cannot reasonably ship an Android phone without it - nobody would buy it. isn't this what amazon does?

And as a result they have terrible sales: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/aug/26/amazon-fi...

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#18
I'm not sure if I am understanding it well. Does the EU have an issue with Google Chrome coming pre-installed with Android? In that case, shouldn't Microsoft face the same penalties since IE/Edge comes pre-installed on the Windows OS? I believe that these pre-installed apps can't be uninstalled (because it might happen that you end up with no browsers on your phone), but would making the app uninstallable solve this issue? I know that on Windows I only use IE to install Chrome, then I ignore it for ever.

I think that it is only fair that Android are allowed to bundle soft of their software with each Android release. Then again, I hate bloat ware so I kind of understand that point of view too. Maybe Android versions can ship a blank OS (no pre-bundled apps) and you have the option to opt-in to a 'suggested' package which would include apps such as Chrome, search function etc.

I'm not 100% sure I understood the EU commission's problem here (or rather why they targeted specifically Android/Google). Feel free to correct me where I am wrong.

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#19
post #17
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>. The problem isn't the OS itself, it is the Play Store hegemony and the fact you cannot reasonably ship an Android phone without it - nobody would buy it. isn't this what amazon does?

And as a result they have terrible sales: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/aug/26/amazon-fi...

Is that really because of the amazon store?

>There were many interesting anomalies in the launch of the Fire Phone. The $200 price tag for a 32GB version on an AT&T contract – the same price range as the iPhone 5S or Samsung GS5

Their tables are doing much better.

http://www.geekwire.com/2016/50-fire-tablet-vaults-amazon-in...

Re: EU hits Google with second antitrust charge

#20
post #4

Totally implausible scenario, but what would happen if Google were to say "to hell with this" and just completely pull out of the EU? Like full-stop, nothing Google touching the EU. Would there be riots? Would governments try to force Google back? Like, are they so essential to digital life that a complete withdrawal would cause some amount of chaos? And if that's the case, isn't an antitrust suit a bit disingenuous?…

Remember that a huge amount of Google tax evasion is due to EU loophole :)
Post reply on HN