Live data from Hacker News

The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box

nvidia.com

11–20 of 106 posts

Re: The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box

#12
post #7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NVIDIA Tesla P100 has 21 TeraFLOPS of FP16 performance by their words. So they got 8 chips there.

Yep, they showed a diagram of how it fits together: http://i.imgur.com/xk1daFG.jpg

https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/wp-content/upload...

source: https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/inside-pascal/

Re: The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box

#13
post #8
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Nvidia slides had it at $129,000 a pop

Wow, cheap, great for startups!

As of last year prices for general HPC resources were running around $3/GFLOP[1], or about $500,000 for 170TFlops if my math is correct.

Sounds like this is a significant cost savings if it fits your use case.

Re: The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box

#14
post #9

Check out the specs here: http://images.nvidia.com/content/technologies/deep-learning/... though I'm most curious about what motherboard is in there to support NVLink and NVHS. Good overview of Pascal here: https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/inside-pascal/ 1 question: will we see NVLink become an open standard for use in/with other coprocessors? 1 gripe: they give relative performance data as compared to a CP…

It looks like it uses a separate daughterboard that houses the GPUs + NVLink, connected to the main motherboard using quad Infiniband EDR (400Gbps) + RDMA. http://images.anandtech.com/doci/10225/SSP_85.JPG

Re: The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box

#15
post #9

Check out the specs here: http://images.nvidia.com/content/technologies/deep-learning/... though I'm most curious about what motherboard is in there to support NVLink and NVHS. Good overview of Pascal here: https://devblogs.nvidia.com/parallelforall/inside-pascal/ 1 question: will we see NVLink become an open standard for use in/with other coprocessors? 1 gripe: they give relative performance data as compared to a CP…

You mean you're not surprised that a machine with 8 GPUs, apparently costing $129k USD (from comment below), can outperform a single CPU? :)

(Of course, a better metric is that it's getting ~56x the performance at probably ~10x the TDP, but that's not surprising for a GPU with the current state of deep learning code.)

To their credit, the thermal and power engineering needed to get that dense a compute deployment is challenging. (bt, dt, have the corpses of power supplies to show for it.) But the price means that it's going to be limited to hyper-dense HPC deployments by companies that don't have the resources to engineer their own for substantially less money, such as Facebook's Big Sur design: https://code.facebook.com/posts/1687861518126048/facebook-to... . And, of course, the academics and hobbyists will continue to use consumer GPUs , which give much better performance/$ but aren't nearly as HPC-friendly.

Re: The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box

#16
post #6

Wait, how many chips did they cram in there that they're getting 170 TFlops. Even at a very generous 10 TFLOP per chip that would be 17 chips.

NVIDIA Tesla P100 has 21 TeraFLOPS of FP16 performance by their words. So they got 8 chips there.

Ah, half-floats. That explains it. Still pretty high but realistic at least.

Re: The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box

#20
post #18

I am looking forward to OpenCL catching up with CUDA in maturity and adoption, so that NVidia's monopoly in Silicon for deep learning will come to an end.

Me too. I really want to see some benchmarks between cuda code and opencl code generated from cuda with AMDs compiler. Actually if anyone has a geforce/tesla get on this!
Post reply on HN