The process might seem more complex initially but think of it like this: If you add a new member to your team, they would have to fork the repositories on GitHub, clone them locally, make the changes, push to their own fork and then create the pull request Annndddd we're done - its easy to make a pull request from a branch; this person has no idea what they're doing. In addition, the new GitHub code review tools addr…
Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
11–20 of 168 posts
Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#12- [Gerrit Code Review for GitHub](http://gerrithub.io/)
Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#13What I miss in article is for how long they are on it. Is author after peak of inflated expectations? I have used Gerrit in my previous team and it did not worked so well. Hanging vetos on -2 are not that nice when you have to push feature forward, like instead of blocking it someone else could just fix it, by the time you talked person who put -2 to change it to -1. But maybe with more mature team it would not be a…
Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#14The process might seem more complex initially but think of it like this: If you add a new member to your team, they would have to fork the repositories on GitHub, clone them locally, make the changes, push to their own fork and then create the pull request Annndddd we're done - its easy to make a pull request from a branch; this person has no idea what they're doing. In addition, the new GitHub code review tools addr…
Does the new GitHub code review tool handle rebased commits like Gerrit does via "patch sets"? That seems like it would be really useful.
Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#15The process might seem more complex initially but think of it like this: If you add a new member to your team, they would have to fork the repositories on GitHub, clone them locally, make the changes, push to their own fork and then create the pull request Annndddd we're done - its easy to make a pull request from a branch; this person has no idea what they're doing. In addition, the new GitHub code review tools addr…
Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#16Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#17The process might seem more complex initially but think of it like this: If you add a new member to your team, they would have to fork the repositories on GitHub, clone them locally, make the changes, push to their own fork and then create the pull request Annndddd we're done - its easy to make a pull request from a branch; this person has no idea what they're doing. In addition, the new GitHub code review tools addr…
Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#18The process might seem more complex initially but think of it like this: If you add a new member to your team, they would have to fork the repositories on GitHub, clone them locally, make the changes, push to their own fork and then create the pull request Annndddd we're done - its easy to make a pull request from a branch; this person has no idea what they're doing. In addition, the new GitHub code review tools addr…
What's wrong about what he said? Which step can you omit?
Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#19"If you add a new member to your team, they would have to fork the repositories on GitHub, clone them locally, make the changes, push to their own fork and then create the pull request." You don't have to do this with Github. Just clone directly to your local machine. Also, you don't have to use git flow when using Github. I think git flow seems to be the real culprit of the symptoms you have identified.
Re: Abandoning Gitflow and GitHub in favour of Gerrit
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's wrong about what he said? Which step can you omit?
It's not that any of those steps can be omitted, it's that those steps overall are not difficult or complex.