Live data from Hacker News

Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

eff.org

11–20 of 135 posts

Re: Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

#11
Personally, I think civil disobedience is more effective at changing the status quo than e-mail campaigns, although they can help to increase awareness. What I would really like to see is a big institution / university take a stand and build something like Scihub to provide free and unlimited access to all of their own papers, even those that are stuck behind a paywall for "historic" reasons. It would be interesting to see if the publishing industry would dare to sue them in that case, as this could easily tip the public opinion against them.

In the end, I think the publishers know perfectly well that their business models have been made obsolete by the Internet long ago and that their value proposition is getting smaller and smaller, so they just want to squeeze the last remaining profits from their historically earned privileged position.

Re: Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

#12
post #7

I have to say, we should all be super grateful for the OSS community. There's so much free non-publicly funded continuously supported OSS available within a click of a button. I am a data scientist, and everyday I am amazed how powerful the anaconda distribution (and its over 150 included packages) is. Is there any industry on Earth that has anything like OSS?

I have wondered this before as well. I can't think of any industry that is as open as FOSS. There is FOSS available for literally everything you could ever want or need[0].

FOSS enabled me to learn about programming computers with zero cost (other than the hardware of course). Sure the paid closed source tools are probably "better" (usually that mostly means prettier) but it amazes me that anyone on earth can grab a free Linux distro and it will come with access to a huge collection of software that will allow that person to learn and better themselves. In the developed world that doesn't really seem all that amazing. I mean most people would just buy a Mac and go to an expensive university but in a lot of the world where money and education are close to non-existent it is truly incredible.

I am glad we live in a world with FOSS and with people who are extremely passionate about it (EFF, RMS, etc.). It puts pressure on the big software companies to not be total bastards. Imagine a world where only the elite educated had access to the software tools needed to drive innovation. A world controlled by Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, Intel, Google, Oracle, etc.

[0] Okay now somebody will point out an edge case ;)

Re: Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

#13
post #3

"Be publicly available" you mean available to everybody on earth even though they have not funded it ?

In an ideal system sure. Country A funds research into Subject A. Country B funds research into Subject B. Then everyone has access to everything and can work better towards Subject A+B or whatever.

I do not agree with restriction of information that has been publicly funded. It should be in the public domain for the better of humanity. It shouldn't matter who funded it, you pay it forward and maybe one day a country that had access to your countries research does something that your country can use and so the circle goes again.

Re: Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

#14
post #9

I sent a letter. I really want to know how effective these mass stock-email campaigns are.

I've heard from a few people who work in politics in state and national congresses that (non-form) physical letters and phone calls from concerned constituents can have a surprising amount of weight on the decisions of congresspeople. I imagine it's less true for form emails like this, but still probably worth a go.

Re: Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

#15
post #5
post #3

"Be publicly available" you mean available to everybody on earth even though they have not funded it ?

Don't worry. The Chinese probably have it 12 months before it's even made publicly available.

Just searching for 0DAY-WAREZ[PDFRIP][3l-H4X0R]QUANTUMG4viT4TI0N-S02E04[torrents4TW].doc.pdf would greatly increase interest in basic science for teenagers !

Re: Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

#16
post #3

"Be publicly available" you mean available to everybody on earth even though they have not funded it ?

Why not? Aside from the obvious altruistic reasons, the cost of restricting it is probably more than the cost of not bothering to do so.

Re: Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

#18
post #12
post #7

I have to say, we should all be super grateful for the OSS community. There's so much free non-publicly funded continuously supported OSS available within a click of a button. I am a data scientist, and everyday I am amazed how powerful the anaconda distribution (and its over 150 included packages) is. Is there any industry on Earth that has anything like OSS?

I have wondered this before as well. I can't think of any industry that is as open as FOSS. There is FOSS available for literally everything you could ever want or need[0]. FOSS enabled me to learn about programming computers with zero cost (other than the hardware of course). Sure the paid closed source tools are probably "better" (usually that mostly means prettier) but it amazes me that anyone on earth can grab a…

My Counter-Strike addiction would like a word with you.

Although Linux support has been getting a lot better for gaming, admittedly.

Re: Publicly Funded Research Should Be Publicly Available

#20

This world is so surreal it's actually amazing. How the people running our countries can be this incompetent, slow, and unintelligent is beyond me.

Run for office. Your competence, speed and intelligence should make you a shoo-in and you can help fix things.
Post reply on HN