Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
11–20 of 245 posts
Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#12We've gone from "Won't somebody think of the children" to "Won't somebody think of every single possible group that is possible to somehow offend in some way"
Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#13Also, there's the larger narrative of people buying tablets and putting off PC upgrades, so the PC ages. Don't worry Apple, you're still getting their money. Its just people aren't ready to replace a general purpose computer that they control and can run pretty much everything with a walled garden mobile device designed to get ad impressions and consume media.
If anything, this is Apple's frustration. They have all this success but people and businesses keep buying PCs. They'll never crack this market. They're too invested in the Jobsian "closed" ecosystem philosophy to be as agile as the PC platform. Mocking those who don't drink their kool-aid just makes them look like sore winners.
edit: I'm aware I can buy a newer chip, but from a single core vs single core perspective its not that much faster. Very little consumer software is properly multi-threaded so this is why my expensive work computer with the newest i7 doesnt feel any faster than my 5 year old desktop at home. Most things are pegged to one core and at the end of the day single core performance is what's going to matter.
Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#14Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#15That said, it was an obviously stupid stat for Schiller to cite. But now we're going to be subjected to a long series of Apple-bashing articles that overreach in the opposite direction. By the end of today we'll see multiple "actually, I'm proud to be running 5-year-old PC" posts.
Why? Because when mining for pageviews, there are few veins as rich as bashing Apple.
Edit to add: If we want to talk about the tech industry and poor people, let's do so. How many new companies are variations of "let us bring things to your door for you for an extra fee" or "let's give you personalized service so you don't have to go shopping/ride a bus/interact with a human"?
Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#16Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#17Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#18And in that time, I've upgraded the processor, doubled the memory, upgraded the hard drive to an SSD, switched the video card twice, upped the number of connected monitors from one to three, and upgraded the OS from 32-bit Vista to 64-bit Windows 10.
It was pretty leading edge when I built it, and it's still pretty leading edge today. What's sad is the expectation that I should throw my computer away every 18 months.
Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#19Runs fine.
Re: Dear Apple, there’s nothing ‘really sad’ about using a 5-year-old PC
#20As a die-hard retrocomputing enthusiast with far more old computers in my basement than new, I'm biased. But I sure think that the time has come for the compute industry to start highlighting the need for lesser computing power, but yet still more productive computing.
8-bit computers are awesome. 16-bit machines superb! Get yourself set up with these systems and you can entertain yourself for hours and hours. 8-bit is a great way to learn software development - 2 hours of 8-bit coding a week will keep you sharper than sharp when the time comes to go back to the hipstertools-de-jour. (I kid, I kid.)
Point is this, folks: old computers never die - their users do.