Live data from Hacker News

Hulk Hogan awarded payout over Gawker sex tapes

bbc.co.uk

11–20 of 176 posts

Re: Hulk Hogan awarded payout over Gawker sex tapes

#11

Before anyone goes on a "Gawker is a terrible site, they deserve it" tangent, keep in mind that this does set precedent for other individuals to sue other media companies for massive amounts of money, which could be another problem for an already-struggling ecosystem. (Although in fairness, this incident is particularly egregious, especially as they disobeyed a judge's order to take down the video)

Most other media sites do not have the history and reputation that Gawker does.

Re: Hulk Hogan awarded payout over Gawker sex tapes

#12

Before anyone goes on a "Gawker is a terrible site, they deserve it" tangent, keep in mind that this does set precedent for other individuals to sue other media companies for massive amounts of money, which could be another problem for an already-struggling ecosystem. (Although in fairness, this incident is particularly egregious, especially as they disobeyed a judge's order to take down the video)

What's wrong about a precedent that an online blog platform should not be permitted to publish people's sex tapes? That does not seem like a particular dangerous precedent to me.

Re: Hulk Hogan awarded payout over Gawker sex tapes

#14

What's the time table for Gawker's payment? Can they appeal without paying?

In many states you don't have to pay until the appeals process is complete, but in Florida you have to pay (or at least post a bond, it's unclear) immediately. There's a good chance Gawker will be closing down.

Re: Hulk Hogan awarded payout over Gawker sex tapes

#15

Before anyone goes on a "Gawker is a terrible site, they deserve it" tangent, keep in mind that this does set precedent for other individuals to sue other media companies for massive amounts of money, which could be another problem for an already-struggling ecosystem. (Although in fairness, this incident is particularly egregious, especially as they disobeyed a judge's order to take down the video)

> Before anyone goes on a "Gawker is a terrible site, they deserve it" tangent, keep in mind that this does set precedent for other individuals to sue other media companies for massive amounts of money, which could be another problem for an already-struggling ecosystem. (Although in fairness, this incident is particularly egregious, especially as they disobeyed a judge's order to take down the video)

1) Nonconsensual porn shouldn't be posted to the internet. The details can be discussed just fine without the visual.

2) It most certainly shouldn't be kept online after a judicial order to take it down.

Re: Hulk Hogan awarded payout over Gawker sex tapes

#17
I'm not sure how I feel about the verdict (freedom of speech vs privacy), but I'm really happy that the media sexist bias was exposed. It was really distasteful how they were criticising and condemning "The Fappening" (i.e. female stolen porn) while happily participating in the reverse (Hulk Hogan's male stolen porn).

Re: Hulk Hogan awarded payout over Gawker sex tapes

#18
post #2

Good for him. I think Jerry "Tycho" Holkins expresses best how I feel about Gawker in this whole affair. https://www.penny-arcade.com/news/post/2016/03/14/the-didact...

Ugh, no thank you. I've liked some of Jerry's opinion pieces in the past, but I think he's way off the mark here, especially with this: > The causes they enunciate are tarnished, just for being in their mouths. That's the kind of thinking that gets you atrocious policy, especially in the judicial sphere. As I said below, people who want bad to enshrine bad precedent will pick the most unsympathetic targets in the cou…

Miranda did not create any rights, only the requirement that the government inform you of your rights...

Re: Hulk Hogan awarded payout over Gawker sex tapes

#19

What's the time table for Gawker's payment? Can they appeal without paying?

In many states you don't have to pay until the appeals process is complete, but in Florida you have to pay (or at least post a bond, it's unclear) immediately. There's a good chance Gawker will be closing down.

"Florida law requires a party to post a bond for the full amount of damages, but that is capped at $50 million #hulkvsgawk"

https://twitter.com/TomKludt/status/710964054060355584

Post reply on HN