Live data from Hacker News

If you invested $1 a day, starting when you were born

stockchoker.com

11–20 of 99 posts

Re: If you invested $1 a day, starting when you were born

#11

Interesting, but I doubt people tend to invest this consistently and regularly. They probably have an easy time investing when times are good (and they actually have a few extra bucks to gamble with), and tend to not invest when times are bad (they're trying to eat). Take someone who was doing pretty good during the tech and real estate bubbles, and decided to invest their spare change in 1998, 1999, 2005 and 2006, b…

Real Estate.

Re: If you invested $1 a day, starting when you were born

#12

Interesting, but I doubt people tend to invest this consistently and regularly. They probably have an easy time investing when times are good (and they actually have a few extra bucks to gamble with), and tend to not invest when times are bad (they're trying to eat). Take someone who was doing pretty good during the tech and real estate bubbles, and decided to invest their spare change in 1998, 1999, 2005 and 2006, b…

You are wrong.

Start here - https://www.bogleheads.org/

Re: If you invested $1 a day, starting when you were born

#15

Well, someone should market this for parents. Definitely an opportunity for some company.

They already do, it is called a college fund, or 529 plan. Most parents with any sense are investing early because that's the only way to save up the $200,000 that college will cost per kid.

[0] https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/pay-for-college/college-c...

Select public in-state college, and 18 years from now, 4 year, it will cost $225K. Better get saving!

Re: If you invested $1 a day, starting when you were born

#19

Does this take into account commission fees ? If I am charged $7 per trade and I invest 1$ per day I am losing 6$ per day to commission. Or are you assuming this is commission free ?

Assuming this is going into an index fund. I'm guessing that fund management fees are not included.

Speaking of commission, it "has to" be a fund because the SP500 is not constant, companies are continually being added and removed. Otherwise you'd directly owe substantial commissions and you'd have to be careful to avoid various capital gains income taxes while endlessly rebalancing.

There are a lot of index funds, for no apparent reason the first one I checked was VFINX and it's annual expense ratio is 0.17% which is pretty low compared to the average return over the past 90 years around 10%.

So the actual result would be a little lower, although not staggeringly so.

Re: If you invested $1 a day, starting when you were born

#20

This is only true if there were no fees associated with investing, which is ridiculous. If you went to a stock broker with a dollar per day, you would be very lucky to end up with $0.01 in equity that day.

You could just do it in lump sums twice a year or similar. Plus unmanaged funds like indexes have lower recurring fees than managed funds.
Post reply on HN