Live data from Hacker News

GitLab 8.5 released

about.gitlab.com

11–20 of 246 posts

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#11
post #6

We're super excited with GitLab 8.5. It's much faster, no matter the size of your instance (but especially for larger instances). The Todos, ability to revert commits and CNAME support for Pages, are things that have been much requested and we're happy to have now. As always, we're here if anyone has any questions about anything.

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/11489 Didn't make it in?

It seems not, unfortunately, I'm sorry if you were waiting for it.

I'll discuss if we can ship it in a patch [0], otherwise it'll land in a month in CE.

[0]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/11489#note_38...

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#13
post #9

> With GitLab 8.5, we’re offering GitLab Geo as an Alpha to all our Enterprise Edition customers. Once GitLab Geo has left Alpha / Beta state, a special license will be required to use it. I'm not sure I like this trend. While I understand some features GitLab may feel its worth a "second license" fee, it sets a bad precedent. Similarly, I don't want to give you $390/year for a GitLab instance with 2-3 users which ke…

afaik there will be possibility to get a license for n users instead n*10 packs.

That's correct.

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#14

> With GitLab 8.5, we’re offering GitLab Geo as an Alpha to all our Enterprise Edition customers. Once GitLab Geo has left Alpha / Beta state, a special license will be required to use it. I'm not sure I like this trend. While I understand some features GitLab may feel its worth a "second license" fee, it sets a bad precedent. Similarly, I don't want to give you $390/year for a GitLab instance with 2-3 users which ke…

We will make it possible to buy a license for n users, rather than n*10 users (as noted below).

If you're not interested in GitLab Geo, you won't have to pay for it, while maintaining all other EE features.

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#15

> With GitLab 8.5, we’re offering GitLab Geo as an Alpha to all our Enterprise Edition customers. Once GitLab Geo has left Alpha / Beta state, a special license will be required to use it. I'm not sure I like this trend. While I understand some features GitLab may feel its worth a "second license" fee, it sets a bad precedent. Similarly, I don't want to give you $390/year for a GitLab instance with 2-3 users which ke…

[deleted]

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#16
post #5

I've moved all my private repos to Gitlab based on the chat on here and other places recently RE Github, Gitlab, and other solutions. I'm very happy overall, the interface is great. It's a bit slower than github currently (the web interface) as I'm using the online version rather than self hosted, but apart from that it's really bloody good. I'll be recommending it to others going forward and using it for all new rep…

What procedures did you follow to move your private repos over? I have been using private, self hosted git for years now. Were you able to move things over and keep commit history? (since I guess that's the only feature I currently have.)

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#17
post #16
post #5

I've moved all my private repos to Gitlab based on the chat on here and other places recently RE Github, Gitlab, and other solutions. I'm very happy overall, the interface is great. It's a bit slower than github currently (the web interface) as I'm using the online version rather than self hosted, but apart from that it's really bloody good. I'll be recommending it to others going forward and using it for all new rep…

What procedures did you follow to move your private repos over? I have been using private, self hosted git for years now. Were you able to move things over and keep commit history? (since I guess that's the only feature I currently have.)

If you move your repository by importing it (in GitLab UI, under new project) or just by clone + pushing it yourself, you will always retain your entire commit history.

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#18
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/11489 Didn't make it in?

It seems not, unfortunately, I'm sorry if you were waiting for it. I'll discuss if we can ship it in a patch [0], otherwise it'll land in a month in CE. [0]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/11489#note_38...

Thanks, Looking forward to it.

otherwise, congrats on another release!

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#19
post #16
post #5

I've moved all my private repos to Gitlab based on the chat on here and other places recently RE Github, Gitlab, and other solutions. I'm very happy overall, the interface is great. It's a bit slower than github currently (the web interface) as I'm using the online version rather than self hosted, but apart from that it's really bloody good. I'll be recommending it to others going forward and using it for all new rep…

What procedures did you follow to move your private repos over? I have been using private, self hosted git for years now. Were you able to move things over and keep commit history? (since I guess that's the only feature I currently have.)

I just added Gitlab as a new remote, and pushed. Easy as that. Keeps the entire repo history. I then just removed my old Github remotes.

Re: GitLab 8.5 released

#20
post #5

I've moved all my private repos to Gitlab based on the chat on here and other places recently RE Github, Gitlab, and other solutions. I'm very happy overall, the interface is great. It's a bit slower than github currently (the web interface) as I'm using the online version rather than self hosted, but apart from that it's really bloody good. I'll be recommending it to others going forward and using it for all new rep…

Thanks, that's good to hear. We're working hard on making it faster, this release being a major milestone in that work. Last release, we started shipping a performance monitoring tool [0], to make it easier to see what exactly is slow. [0]: https://about.gitlab.com/2016/01/22/gitlab-8-4-released/

Nice, I'll take a look.
Post reply on HN