Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
11–20 of 50 posts
Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#12Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#13Exactly what happened? Most hospitals use proprietary electronic medical record systems. These are layered constructs of different networks requiring different passwords and VPNs for their different functions. Is there an actual url that one can visit to verify this? Did the internet archive capture this in a snapshot I can see? Or is this smack that a neighboring hospital is pushing to capture market share in this e…
>Most hospitals use proprietary electronic medical record systems. These are layered constructs of different networks requiring different passwords and VPNs for their different functions.
That's idealistic. Usually they're giant pieces of shit.
Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#14so who's gonna serve the HIPAA violation sentence?
Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#15Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, there are plenty provisions under the security chapter, funnily enough now that I look at it again (been long time) it seems both 'accountability' (tracking every media in and out) and 'protection from malicious software' are not listed as required. duh. The emergency mode operation plan is however listed as required, and this place was basically shut for a week. I remembered it being more stringent that what i…
Yes, I'd love for HIPAA to say: if we're talking about a medical centre, you've got to be able to snapshot and reimage within X hours with data loss of less than Y hours. One can dream...
Another standard may be needed for the larger businesses.
Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#17I'm sure they'll just pass the cost (either of the ransom, or of the missed profits) onto the patients.
Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#18Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, I'd love for HIPAA to say: if we're talking about a medical centre, you've got to be able to snapshot and reimage within X hours with data loss of less than Y hours. One can dream...
Part of the problem is that HIPAA must be easy for small private practices as well as massive hospitals to follow. Another standard may be needed for the larger businesses.
Re: Ransomware takes Hollywood hospital offline, $3.6M demanded by attackers
#20The internet of things... what could possibly go wrong?
It reminds me a comment from the Usenet, a long ago: "if your VCR is still blinking 12:00 then Linux is not for you".
Most people playing with technology don't know what they're doing. Giving them more power means giving them more danger.