> MURS is the longest range VHF radio service that can be legally utilized by anyone without the need for a radio license. The operator does not need a license, but I believe that the radio must be certified for MURS operation. The Baofeng UV-5R is not [1]. It is certified under Part 90. MURS requires certification under Part 95. [1] http://www.gordonwestradioschool.com/attachments/FCC_Part_90...
In addition, GMRS requires an FCC license.[1] Just because the Baofeng allows you to access the frequencies doesn't mean that you can legally transmit on them. I wonder if this is their Capone-tax-evasion-style Achilles' heel. Enforce those FCC regs! :P [1]: https://www.fcc.gov/general/general-mobile-radio-service-gmr...
Militia Radio Frequencies
11–20 of 109 posts
Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#12Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#13> MURS is the longest range VHF radio service that can be legally utilized by anyone without the need for a radio license. The operator does not need a license, but I believe that the radio must be certified for MURS operation. The Baofeng UV-5R is not [1]. It is certified under Part 90. MURS requires certification under Part 95. [1] http://www.gordonwestradioschool.com/attachments/FCC_Part_90...
To my knowledge you are correct. Although I kind of hope the rules get reworked a little. As a public service volunteer, it would be beneficial to be able to operate on many services with one radio, and many modern radios are capable of being "good citizens" on multiple services simultaneously. (For example, we operate on Part 90, but may interact with members of the public who are carrying a Part 95 radio. Luckily a…
I believe that is correct (also a ham).
For curious non-hams, here is how it works. In the US, generally there are three ways radio bands are licensed.
1. No license is required for the operator to use the band, but the equipment used must be certified for operation in that band.
2. The operator has to have a license to use the band and the equipment must be certified for operation in that band.
3. The operator has to have a license to use the band, but can use any equipment as long as what is actually transmitted meets the legal technical requirements for operation on that band (power levels, modulation types, and so on).
An example of the first method is the Family Radio Service (FRS) bands.
An example of the second method is the General Mobile Radio Service (GMRS). When I say that the operator has to have a license, that does not necessarily mean that the person actually operating the radio has to have a license. With GMRS, for instance, a business can get a license and that covers employee use without the individual employees needing to get licenses.
Ham radio falls under the third method, and offhand I can't think of anything else that does. When a licensed ham is operating a radio all the FCC cares about is what comes out of the antenna, not what equipment produced it.
The way hams get licensed is also quite different. The FCC takes a very hands off approach to ham licensing.
To get a ham license, you have to pass an exam. For the entry level license, that is a 35 question multiple-choice exam that almost anyone here on HN could learn enough to pass in a couple weekends. There is a license level above that which gives you access to more ham bands, which you get by passing another 35 question exam which is a little harder. There is a third license level above that which allows you full access to everything hams are allowed to do. That one is a 50 question exam and is quite a bit harder than the other two.
The FCC neither makes the exams nor administers them. They have authorized 14 organizations as "Volunteer Exam Coordinators" (VECs), and the VECs are responsible for maintaining the pool of exam questions, constructing exams from the question pool, training and certifying people to give the exams, giving the exams, grading them, and reporting the results back to the FCC so the FCC can issue the licenses.
Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#14These photos remind me of William Gibson's observations on tactical fashion -- if you are really a militant, then the last thing you'd want to do is look all tactical and stuff. The Army surplus look, radios with whip antennae, etc., is fun. But in any scenario where militia were up against organized force, I would think they should try to blend into the population. But I guess it's hard to keep morale up if you just…
This is a requirement for operating an amateur radio in most jusisdictions. Ham radio is the concealed-carry of communications technology.
Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#15These photos remind me of William Gibson's observations on tactical fashion -- if you are really a militant, then the last thing you'd want to do is look all tactical and stuff. The Army surplus look, radios with whip antennae, etc., is fun. But in any scenario where militia were up against organized force, I would think they should try to blend into the population. But I guess it's hard to keep morale up if you just…
It's very effective indeed, if you disregard all problems with international law and basic human morals. It's a tactic that have been very successful for Hamas in recent years, for example. Fighting in civilian clothing means that (1) your adversaries will kill much more civilians, honestly mistaking them for you and (2) all your losses can be easily counted as "civilians" by even slightly biased observers. Next step in effectivety is just keeping a couple of children around you in a firefight.
Idealist militants, on the other hand, who are concerned with well-being of civilians they are fighting against always assume some form of uniform, because among other things, it helps to keep at least some rules of engagement in place and protect innocents to some extent.
Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#16Why call them militia-patriots when they're domestic terrorists?
Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#17Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#18Why call them militia-patriots when they're domestic terrorists?
Nobody is a terrorist until he plans or engages in terrorist activity. Do you have evidence that they did something like that?
(Though I'm not sure it really tracks with the definition of a "terrorist," since a terrorist is an armed combatant who explicitly strikes at civilians instead of at their government. A better term here might be more 19th-century-flavored words like insurrectionary or seditionist, though terms like those fell out of use as rebel and guerrilla groups abandoned direct attacks on governments in favor of terroristic tactics.)
Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#19> (obscured by the upper receiver of the assault weapon) You mean the stock of the semi-automatic rifle which happens to be scary and black?
Re: Militia Radio Frequencies
#20> (obscured by the upper receiver of the assault weapon) You mean the stock of the semi-automatic rifle which happens to be scary and black?
A thorough discussion of the definition and it's history can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon