Earlier quoted context omitted.
Multitasking doesn't need to add complexity and stability issues, if ubuntu can do it then so can apple. It does add more power consumption. Multitasking is useful because humans are multitasking. For instance, a navigator that guides someone to their destination could run in parallel to lots of other applications and be very useful that way. Single tasking computers are pretty much done for, multi tasking is the nor…
>Multitasking doesn't need to add complexity and stability issues, if ubuntu can do it then so can apple. That it can be done doesn't mean it isn't complex. It is. And by "stability" I didn't mean the phone/tablet constantly crashing, I meant having inconsistent performance. Once you get into multitasking, everyone and their brother is going to have some really "good" reason they need a service. Some of these will al…
On the contrary, we excel at it by pushing things 'down' when we have mastered them.
For instance, driving and talking to a passenger, walking and thinking about something and so on.
We are so good at it that most of the time we don't even notice any more how many things we are doing at the same time.
The only time we are not multitasking is when we are really concentrating on something difficult, usually problem solving or learning a new skill.