Live data from Hacker News

Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

slate.com

11–20 of 33 posts

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#11
post #7

A better source, with a previous HN discussion, that says much the same thing, is far better sourced, and makes a lot of other important points: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10091586 HN readers will be unhappy to read that the war on drugs is not principally, directly responsible for US incarceration rates. HN readers will probably thrilled to read that responsibility for over-incarceration is placed squarely…

While it may not be the principal account for incarceration rates, the paper does note that 17% of the current prison population is in prison on drug-related charges. Additionally, it notes that 20% of the growth in prison populations can be attributed to drug-related charges, and that about 20% of the flow of prisoners can be attributed to drug-related charges. That 20% number is still a massive number of people inc…

If the CPU usage of my code jumped by a massive percentage, and only 20% of it can be attributed to one problem, I'm certainly going to pay attention to it. But I'm going to pay a lot more attention to the problems causing the other 80%.

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#12
post #6
post #3

A way of explaining it that (hopefully) makes it clearer: Let's say you have just invented the concept of prison, and let's say 50% of people come back every year after going to prison for the first time, and 50% never come back again. In year 2, you'd observe that of the year 1 population, 50% returned, and 50% didn't. In year 2, you'd also add a new influx of prisoners. Therefore, in year 3, you'd observe that of t…

To expand on their mall analogy: There is a big difference between asking "what percentage of this week's mall visitors will return next week", and asking "when people visit this mall for the first time, what percentage of them will return the following week".

So the difference in their studies is what percentage of first time offenders will return to prison vs. what percentage of overall prisoners will return to prison?

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#13
post #12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To expand on their mall analogy: There is a big difference between asking "what percentage of this week's mall visitors will return next week", and asking "when people visit this mall for the first time, what percentage of them will return the following week".

So the difference in their studies is what percentage of first time offenders will return to prison vs. what percentage of overall prisoners will return to prison?

[deleted]

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#14
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While it may not be the principal account for incarceration rates, the paper does note that 17% of the current prison population is in prison on drug-related charges. Additionally, it notes that 20% of the growth in prison populations can be attributed to drug-related charges, and that about 20% of the flow of prisoners can be attributed to drug-related charges. That 20% number is still a massive number of people inc…

If the CPU usage of my code jumped by a massive percentage, and only 20% of it can be attributed to one problem, I'm certainly going to pay attention to it. But I'm going to pay a lot more attention to the problems causing the other 80%.

Not if the 20% was the single largest individual process sucking up power.

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#15
I personally know several people that did go back. The common thread was parole and/or probation programs that just weren't achievable.

Requirements vary, but typically there's: - tons of recurring fees (classes, mandatory drug testing, etc) - reimbursement of the court's costs - classes, parole officer, drug testing, etc, located in areas away from public transportation - judges that chronically no-show, after you've paid to get there, parking, etc.

I spoke to one in-depth...it's about $500/month in direct costs, not including indirect costs like transportation. In many areas you would really have to own a vehicle to get to the required places. Which, for a felon, also means "special" high cost SR-22 insurance.

Couple that with the sort of jobs available to a convicted felon, and...

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#16
post #12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To expand on their mall analogy: There is a big difference between asking "what percentage of this week's mall visitors will return next week", and asking "when people visit this mall for the first time, what percentage of them will return the following week".

So the difference in their studies is what percentage of first time offenders will return to prison vs. what percentage of overall prisoners will return to prison?

Seems more like one counts (Number of prison stays)/(people who have gone to prison), while the other counts (people who have gone to prison more than once)/(The number of people who have gone to prison in total)

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#17
post #7

A better source, with a previous HN discussion, that says much the same thing, is far better sourced, and makes a lot of other important points: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10091586 HN readers will be unhappy to read that the war on drugs is not principally, directly responsible for US incarceration rates. HN readers will probably thrilled to read that responsibility for over-incarceration is placed squarely…

> HN readers will probably thrilled to read that responsibility for over-incarceration is placed squarely on overzealous prosecutors; the rate at which arrestees are charged with felonies has climbed sharply, despite an overall drop in crime.

Might it not be a cause of the overall drop in crime? If more criminals are being held in prison for longer periods, they have less opportunity to commit new crimes, no?

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#18
post #9
post #7

A better source, with a previous HN discussion, that says much the same thing, is far better sourced, and makes a lot of other important points: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10091586 HN readers will be unhappy to read that the war on drugs is not principally, directly responsible for US incarceration rates. HN readers will probably thrilled to read that responsibility for over-incarceration is placed squarely…

> the rate at which arrestees are charged with felonies has climbed sharply, despite an overall drop in crime. My gut reaction is that it's probably because of an overall drop in crime. Gotta keep putting up good numbers!

[deleted]

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#19
post #15

I personally know several people that did go back. The common thread was parole and/or probation programs that just weren't achievable. Requirements vary, but typically there's: - tons of recurring fees (classes, mandatory drug testing, etc) - reimbursement of the court's costs - classes, parole officer, drug testing, etc, located in areas away from public transportation - judges that chronically no-show, after you'v…

If you choose to serve out your sentence in full do you still have to go through all these different fees and classes?

Do all felons have to have SR-22 insurance or only those convicted of vehicle offences?

Re: Why do so many ex-offenders go back to prison? A new study suggests they don't

#20
post #7

A better source, with a previous HN discussion, that says much the same thing, is far better sourced, and makes a lot of other important points: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10091586 HN readers will be unhappy to read that the war on drugs is not principally, directly responsible for US incarceration rates. HN readers will probably thrilled to read that responsibility for over-incarceration is placed squarely…

> HN readers will be unhappy to read ...

> HN readers will probably thrilled to read ...

I'm unhappy to read this, which does not help the tone of the conversation, and is a counter-productive rhetorical maneuver. It attempts to pre-emptively pidgeonhole people who disagree rather than to learn about what they really think and, gosh forbid, value their opinions and learn from them.

Post reply on HN