Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suspect this would result in rather superficial weed destruction, since the roots underground would be unharmed and would cause the weed to regrow a few days later. Unrooting the weeds definitely sounds more reliable to me.
> Unrooting the weeds definitely sounds more reliable to me. The robot in the article just pushed the weed underground a few inches. I imagine that some weeds would just pop back after a week, and that the robot would just punch them down again.
Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
11–20 of 73 posts
Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#12That's brilliant. What about using a laser to destroy the weeds?
Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#13That's brilliant. What about using a laser to destroy the weeds?
This video of punching the weeds looks promising, but just a thought: maybe you could focus sunlight to burn them? :)
Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#14Cool prototype. ...now make one that mounts on a front 3pt hitch and you might actually sell one. No need for a special robot when a different piece of equipment with its own power source has to go down the field anyway
Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#15Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#16I don't see it detecting any actual weeds? The detection is just targets and the demonstration of punching the weeds is stationary. Which leaves out the key challenge - distinguishing between weed & crop.
Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#17I don't see it detecting any actual weeds? The detection is just targets and the demonstration of punching the weeds is stationary. Which leaves out the key challenge - distinguishing between weed & crop.
I'm not so sure punching is a great solution though. Weed is incredibly good at reforming from very very small bits left standing.
Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#18Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#19It's the easiest way to keep weeds under control but not the only practical way. (Source: I worked for the weed science department (yes, they had one at my school) while at university.)
Here are some other methods for reducing weeds:
1) Before planting, till and water the field causing weeds to germinate. Then harrow the field killing all the weeds. Do this multiple times if needed.
2) Good old fashioned cultivation as was done before the herbicide period. (The article on the robot was posted a few days ago and in response I posted the below... it has a lot of pictured of weed control devices which may be interesting to someone working on robotic weed control....https://archive.org/stream/SteelInTheField/Steel%20in%20the%...)
3) Crop spacing. Space crops so they out-compete the weeds (this is already usually done).
4) Keep fields clean. Keep the ditch-rows clean. Don't let weeds go to seed. After a period of time the bank of weed seeds in the soil is reduced and there are less weeds to control
I know herbicides are faster and cheaper (if we don't consider externalized costs). But they aren't the only "practical" way to eliminate weeds. It does take good management and more effort to eliminate or reduce herbicide use though. I personally think it's very worth it. Oh, and I'm excited about robotics. I don't know about this device, but I do think field robotics is the future.
Re: Robot gets rid of weeds automatically and without herbicides
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Unrooting the weeds definitely sounds more reliable to me. The robot in the article just pushed the weed underground a few inches. I imagine that some weeds would just pop back after a week, and that the robot would just punch them down again.
So you now you have to run your fleet of robot weeders over the field twice? That seems like a waste of time and $ when you could achieve the desired result in a single pass. every extra pass is also more soil compaction.