Live data from Hacker News

Building a global, free and open IoT network

thethingsnetwork.org

11–20 of 28 posts

Re: Building a global, free and open IoT network

#12

Support The Things Network. They are not only supplying easy to activate hardware, they are hard at work at an excellent architecture ( http://forum.thethingsnetwork.org/t/request-for-comments-net... ) and a clean, easy to use integration framework.

it would be so cool to just fiddle with IoT sensors without worrying about a nearby wifi hotspot with access. Just using the Things network as a free and open road is a beautiful idea.

Re: Building a global, free and open IoT network

#14
post #9

How does this compare to the SIGFOX network?

I'm not an expert but a big difference is packet size: Sigfox is limited to 12 bytes, while LoRaWAN is up to 256 (iirc). Sigfox also imposes a max of 140 messages per day. Also, the governing body of LoRa is open (lora alliance), while Sigfox is closed. In general, the LoRaWAN approach is more open, with most if not all of the infrastructure being open sourced.

Re: Building a global, free and open IoT network

#15
post #9

How does this compare to the SIGFOX network?

SIGFOX has certain limits (outside of theoretical and practical bandwidth restrictions) placed on it. radio-electronics.com (http://www.radio-electronics.com/info/wireless/sigfox/basics...) states up to 140 messages of 12 bytes per object per day, with a throughput of up to 100 bytes per second.

The Things network, on the other hand, seems to supply its services openly and freely without limits, using the LoRaWan spec. Semtech (http://www.semtech.com/wireless-rf/lora/LoRa-FAQs.pdf) says it provides between 0.3 and 11kbps of bandwidth, so in theory your speeds can be anywhere from 3x to 111x higher.

Re: Building a global, free and open IoT network

#20
Does this provide a bare IP connection or is it just for MQTT channels back to your servers? I can't tell if that's "the" method of communication or just a helpful thing that you're offering.

Basically, is this something that I would be able to use directly with my company's CoAP APIs?

Post reply on HN