Live data from Hacker News

Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

propublica.org

11–20 of 98 posts

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#11
What exactly is the big aversion to tracking? The vast majority has shown (via actions, not internet noise) that they don't care so what exactly is the big downside?

Not arguing for/against, just want to know reasons beyond "i just dont like it".

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#12
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Run everything from the phone through a VPN over iCloud servers, so all traffic from every iPhone in the world hits the internet as if it comes out of Cupertino? Install Tor as an OS-level feature?

Tor as an OS-level feature may not spark the best reaction. It's been given a bad name ("deep web," silk road, etc) in mass media and many people don't understand it enough to think of it as anything other than bad. I think that it'd be cool to have, but I don't think that Apple would ever implement it.

I never dreamed Apple would in any way officially support, or even acknowledge the existence of, ad blocking.

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#13
post #6

They should be sued for that. There is no way most customers are informed and intentionally consenting to them tampering with the HTTP requests they send to include their customer ID. The obvious expectation of a customer of an ISP is that it sends the data through unchanged.

The data is unchanged. Most ISPs have internal tracking for each request to see how network data flows. You can just think of this as Verizon leaving those tags on - and in this case it owns AOL so it's sharing within the same entity. Not saying good/bad - just how they treat it.

Zombie cookies are ones that are added to HTTP responses by the ISP, so that even if the user clears their cookies manually or opens their browser in incognito mode then the tracking cookie persists.

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#14
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Run everything from the phone through a VPN over iCloud servers, so all traffic from every iPhone in the world hits the internet as if it comes out of Cupertino? Install Tor as an OS-level feature?

Tor as an OS-level feature may not spark the best reaction. It's been given a bad name ("deep web," silk road, etc) in mass media and many people don't understand it enough to think of it as anything other than bad. I think that it'd be cool to have, but I don't think that Apple would ever implement it.

>many people don't understand it enough to think of it as anything other than bad.

And what could transform public opinion of the software to the positive, over night, better than Apple adopting it?

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#15

What exactly is the big aversion to tracking? The vast majority has shown (via actions, not internet noise) that they don't care so what exactly is the big downside? Not arguing for/against, just want to know reasons beyond "i just dont like it".

Zombie cookies in particular are insidious -- while you are actively trying to conceal your identity by proactively deleting cookies or using incognito mode, your ISP re-adds them without your consent.

This kind of aggressive and underhanded behavior should be shamed as it violates the trust that users have in their ISPs.

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#16
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Run everything from the phone through a VPN over iCloud servers, so all traffic from every iPhone in the world hits the internet as if it comes out of Cupertino? Install Tor as an OS-level feature?

Tor as an OS-level feature may not spark the best reaction. It's been given a bad name ("deep web," silk road, etc) in mass media and many people don't understand it enough to think of it as anything other than bad. I think that it'd be cool to have, but I don't think that Apple would ever implement it.

Agree, it's phenomenally unlikely, but then again there is a part of me which could actually imagine Apple doing something like it. They wouldn't use Tor, of course, they'd build a proprietary equivalent, and then come out on a black stage to 'introduce Apple Undercover, a revolutionary enhancement to personal network privacy and security'.

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#17
post #10

Previously: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10354692

There's a lot of randomness in what gets traction on HN, so sometimes a story needs to be posted a few times before it does. So we don't consider reposts to be duplicates until the story has had significant attention on HN (see https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html).

One downside is that the original submitter of a story doesn't always end up with the karma for it.

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#18
This is the state of ISP regulation in the US, providers willfully manipulating the payload they have been paid to transport.

I think a ISP that manipulates data beyond what is necessary for transport should lose it's immunity and associated privileges.

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#19
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Run everything from the phone through a VPN over iCloud servers, so all traffic from every iPhone in the world hits the internet as if it comes out of Cupertino? Install Tor as an OS-level feature?

Tor as an OS-level feature may not spark the best reaction. It's been given a bad name ("deep web," silk road, etc) in mass media and many people don't understand it enough to think of it as anything other than bad. I think that it'd be cool to have, but I don't think that Apple would ever implement it.

It would also make their phones seem bizarrely slow which is not very Apple like.

Re: Verizon revives "zombie cookie" device tracking on AOL's ad network

#20
post #15

What exactly is the big aversion to tracking? The vast majority has shown (via actions, not internet noise) that they don't care so what exactly is the big downside? Not arguing for/against, just want to know reasons beyond "i just dont like it".

Zombie cookies in particular are insidious -- while you are actively trying to conceal your identity by proactively deleting cookies or using incognito mode, your ISP re-adds them without your consent. This kind of aggressive and underhanded behavior should be shamed as it violates the trust that users have in their ISPs.

A lot of this came about because of the "war" on the 3rd party cookie which was unfairly demonized.

I get why zombie cookies are bad as it takes control away, but what is the issue surrounding plain tracking of behaviours? So what if a company knows the history of sites you've visited - what does this do against you?

Post reply on HN