Live data from Hacker News

Give Google Contributor a try: Pay to remove ads

mattcutts.com

11–20 of 472 posts

Re: Give Google Contributor a try: Pay to remove ads

#13
So with this system, the same amount of space is still taken up by ads? I don't think that's really a huge improvement.

I think my ideal system would be something where a website can offer a bitcoin* address in a header, and at the end of the month my browser randomly picks a set of addresses it's seen, and sends money to them. (In conjunction with current ad-blocking technology.)

* Bitcoin probably wouldn't work due to transaction limits, but maybe some sort of sidechain, alternative coin, or something similar.

Re: Give Google Contributor a try: Pay to remove ads

#14
post #5

> This is cool for several reasons: 4. Google gets paid, rather than all the money going to the actual website.

They are facilitating the entire process, processing the credit cards, cutting checks, sending tax forms... Even bitcoin transactions have fees.

Re: Give Google Contributor a try: Pay to remove ads

#16
This is fascinating. Business model: annoy people so much that they pay you to stop annoying them.

Everybody's been talking about the death of display ads, and it looks like Google's paying attention and trying to figure out how to marginalize the ad itself, but still take money on the transaction.

Eventually, Google could probably marginalize the ad so much that there are only a rare few display ads left online, and Google has cleverly tricked us into keeping that industry aloft, essentially paying to keep something we hate alive.

Re: Give Google Contributor a try: Pay to remove ads

#18
In terms of generating-revenue-without-running-ads, I do think Patreon is still a better option, as it both provides a consistent, nonseasonal revenue source for the author and content guarantees for the user; a win-win in both cases.

Google Contributor is more of a charitable option which might be too subtle.

Re: Give Google Contributor a try: Pay to remove ads

#19

So with this system, the same amount of space is still taken up by ads? I don't think that's really a huge improvement. I think my ideal system would be something where a website can offer a bitcoin* address in a header, and at the end of the month my browser randomly picks a set of addresses it's seen, and sends money to them. (In conjunction with current ad-blocking technology.) * Bitcoin probably wouldn't work due…

Or, even better, gave a proportional amount based on the amount you've visited. Better yet, give a Humble-Bundle-like distribution slider to allow you to alter it by preferences ("HN already has funding, give all of my BTC to individual bloggers they've linked...").

Re: Give Google Contributor a try: Pay to remove ads

#20

So with this system, the same amount of space is still taken up by ads? I don't think that's really a huge improvement. I think my ideal system would be something where a website can offer a bitcoin* address in a header, and at the end of the month my browser randomly picks a set of addresses it's seen, and sends money to them. (In conjunction with current ad-blocking technology.) * Bitcoin probably wouldn't work due…

Someone could probably build a browser plugin to at least keep track and divvy up money. The real problem is people say they want to support sites but they really don't want to see ads or support the site.
Post reply on HN