Live data from Hacker News

How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

bloomberg.com

1–10 of 38 posts

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#6
post #4

There is an interesting image[1] at the bottom of the article, about how to extract the DNA from a strawberry, surprised (and partially sceptical) that it's really that simple. [1] http://assets.bwbx.io/images/iBaJbMBMgtrI/v1/-1x-1.jpg

It really is that easy. I did some very simple splicing in a genetic engineering lab in undergrad with soybeans, and while there was less DNA (which we extracted for PCR), the process was still mostly centrifuging and alcohol.

Here's another source on the strawberry thing[1].

[1] http://genetics.thetech.org/online-exhibits/do-it-yourself-s...

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#9
post #4

There is an interesting image[1] at the bottom of the article, about how to extract the DNA from a strawberry, surprised (and partially sceptical) that it's really that simple. [1] http://assets.bwbx.io/images/iBaJbMBMgtrI/v1/-1x-1.jpg

It helps that strawberries are octoploid, they have 8 copies of each chromosome. I remember doing this in a high school biology lab. (Much more fun than enzyme extraction from livers...)

Re: How Driscoll’s Is Hacking the Strawberry of the Future

#10

Driscoll strawberries are disgusting when compared to a more natural and naturally grown strawberry.

What kind is that, exactly? Since, you know, humans have been selecting and cultivating plants for specific characteristics since the beginning of agriculture. And that's all that this article is describing, saying "I like this characteristic, lets try breeding it with this other strain and see what comes about". I would be interested in these primitive, untouched by man strains you seem to be referencing, as such, and where you found them.
Post reply on HN