New Startup Investment Model
mikekarnj.com
New Startup Investment Model
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: New Startup Investment Model
#2The USA basketball analogy is apt, because the team failed to perform until they started to "field complete teams instead of piecing together rosters of NBA All-Stars at the last minute." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_men%27s_national_...)
There's certainly something here--sharing office space, legal resources, unsuccessful teams folding into more successful ones--but I think the best success will come with teams whose focus isn't split.
Re: New Startup Investment Model
#3Re: New Startup Investment Model
#4A few problems come immediately to mind - people and personality conflicts. Can you imagine 3 CEO typess competing for resources/timing on various projects? It might sound ideally initially but conflicts in time and resources are bound to happen.
The second is trying to convince each startup founder that their idea is equivalent to the other two and the timing/stage of development is the same. I doubt it's an impossible idea, but certainly not an easy one to execute. A lot of (contractual) planning for "worst case scenarios" would be especially important here.
Re: New Startup Investment Model
#5Startups are still far more than just their teams. This is different - the author seems to be arguing for something broader as if they create a shared contract technical organization underneath each of the 3+ ventures that may go in wildly different directions. A few problems come immediately to mind - people and personality conflicts. Can you imagine 3 CEO typess competing for resources/timing on various projects? I…
Re: New Startup Investment Model
#6Re: New Startup Investment Model
#7Startups are still far more than just their teams. This is different - the author seems to be arguing for something broader as if they create a shared contract technical organization underneath each of the 3+ ventures that may go in wildly different directions. A few problems come immediately to mind - people and personality conflicts. Can you imagine 3 CEO typess competing for resources/timing on various projects? I…
Re: New Startup Investment Model
#8Startups are still far more than just their teams. This is different - the author seems to be arguing for something broader as if they create a shared contract technical organization underneath each of the 3+ ventures that may go in wildly different directions. A few problems come immediately to mind - people and personality conflicts. Can you imagine 3 CEO typess competing for resources/timing on various projects? I…
We've been ironing out this process over the last year. We inject a venture with need resources up front and then taper them off. That way we don't continuously struggle with conflicts. Details at http://sproutbox.com/what .
Re: New Startup Investment Model
#9The best teams are 2 or more people, including at least one technical founder. The idea that startups would "would share the resources of the most talented web developers and designers" doesn't make sense--these people should be founders. The USA basketball analogy is apt, because the team failed to perform until they started to "field complete teams instead of piecing together rosters of NBA All-Stars at the last mi…