A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
java-is-the-new-c.blogspot.com
A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
1–10 of 36 posts
Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#2Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#3PS. The moving gif's make it very hard to read.
Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#4Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#5Might be quick when running but the jvm startup time is a pain. By the time the java solution starts up, my c based solution has already finished.
Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#6Might be quick when running but the jvm startup time is a pain. By the time the java solution starts up, my c based solution has already finished.
Startup time in a server is a non-issue... Those processes keep running the whole time.
Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#7Might be quick when running but the jvm startup time is a pain. By the time the java solution starts up, my c based solution has already finished.
40ms sounds okay for me, even for most command line tools. Oh and I most probably don't get a segmentation fault ;-)
Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Startup time in a server is a non-issue... Those processes keep running the whole time.
Yeah, and memory is infinite, and all disks are free, and the computing fairies make all the processors super fast. But back in the real world, startup time is a valid concern.
Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#9PS. The moving gif's make it very hard to read.
Don't look at the "moving gif's" (sic.). Then it will be easier to read.
Our brains are geared for paying attention to things that move, especially things that move irregularly (like poorly looped gifs).
Re: A persistent key-value server in 40 lines and a sad fact (2014)
#10Might be quick when running but the jvm startup time is a pain. By the time the java solution starts up, my c based solution has already finished.
http://blog.ndk.io/2014/02/11/jvm-slow-startup.html 40ms sounds okay for me, even for most command line tools. Oh and I most probably don't get a segmentation fault ;-)