Live data from Hacker News

“Houston, We've Had a Problem” (1975)

hq.nasa.gov

1–10 of 51 posts

Re: “Houston, We've Had a Problem” (1975)

#3
post #2

Do people put these background patterns behind text expressly to hamper legibility?

First thing I did was open inspector tools and delete that background attribute.

Yes, it's an attribute - not a CSS property. We're talkin' early space age stuff here, remember.

Re: “Houston, We've Had a Problem” (1975)

#6
post #4
post #2

Do people put these background patterns behind text expressly to hamper legibility?

According to a comment in the source, the page seems to be from 2001, when people didn't know better. Also look at that tell-tale footer!

That footer is really 1995 style.

Re: “Houston, We've Had a Problem” (1975)

#8
Although 13 was quite a near-disaster, I'm surprised that there isn't just as much attention to how much 11 very nearly was a disaster too.

During 11's descent to the moon the LEM's computer was overloaded and started throwing alarms. In addition Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin realized the craft overshot its intended landing spot and was heading for a field of rocks and boulders where landing would be impossible. What saved them is Neil taking manual control of the LEM, finding a smooth landing spot, and touching down the LEM with only seconds of fuel to spare.

Neil's landing is in my mind just as amazing as the recovery of 13. There was no way Neil could have really prepared for a manual landing in the low gravity of the moon. In fact when they tried to test it on Earth, it very nearly killed him (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDI8SQ2fmLA). It was purely Armstrong's intelligence and attitude under pressure that got 11 on the moon safely.

And if you learn more about Armstrong you'll see it was no fluke how he performed on 11's landing. When testing the X-15 rocket plane he lost control and skipped off the top of the atmosphere but was still able to save the flight. Or during Gemini 8 when a thruster got stuck he aborted the docking attempt and fired the re-entry thruster to regain control (all of this while the craft was spinning more than once a second! http://news.discovery.com/space/history-of-space/neil-armstr...). There's a great write-up here with more details on his amazing performances under pressure: http://www.wired.com/2012/08/neil-armstrong_test-pliot/

Without Neil Armstrong Apollo 11 very likely would have ended with Richard Nixon reading this somber message to a devastated nation: http://watergate.info/1969/07/20/an-undelivered-nixon-speech...

Re: “Houston, We've Had a Problem” (1975)

#10
post #8

Although 13 was quite a near-disaster, I'm surprised that there isn't just as much attention to how much 11 very nearly was a disaster too. During 11's descent to the moon the LEM's computer was overloaded and started throwing alarms. In addition Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin realized the craft overshot its intended landing spot and was heading for a field of rocks and boulders where landing would be impossible. Wha…

I have read the selection process that was described in Lost Moon (the book of appolo 13). The NASA were literally recruiting superhumans back then. The smartest, healthiest, toughest and on on ...

So I am not at all surprised that he managed to pull it off.

https://www.countbayesie.com/blog/2015/2/18/hans-solo-and-ba...

Post reply on HN