DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
1–10 of 48 posts
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#2See also the related document the study's author submitted to the FCC:
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#3In what cases does modern technology produce stronger, as opposed to more ordered, EMF than naturally occurs?
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#4The title could perhaps mislead people into believing that DNA is some kind of communication device for extraterrestrial beings rather than the intention of this article which is to point out that EM radiation like that from your cellphone in your pocket can cause cancer.
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#5Here is an open review which is also more thorough: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10762-011-9794-5
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#6Here is an open review which is also more thorough: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10762-011-9794-5
Although this also covers non-ionizing radiation, this is a very different frequency range.
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#7How is DNA self-similar?
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#8Perhaps we should use spread spectrum techniques instead of a single prominent carrier frequency. That way, the signal will look mostly like noise and will not trigger any biological mechanisms that resonate at certain frequencies.
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#9In what cases does modern technology produce stronger, as opposed to more ordered, EMF than naturally occurs?
Any time there's an amplifier and antennae?
Re: DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields (2011)
#10The title could perhaps mislead people into believing that DNA is some kind of communication device for extraterrestrial beings rather than the intention of this article which is to point out that EM radiation like that from your cellphone in your pocket can cause cancer.
How different is it from the public concerns about microwaves/cellphones from the last decade ?