I Hate the News (2006)
aaronsw.com
I Hate the News (2006)
1–10 of 192 posts
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#2A lot of people have started turning a blind eye to the TV, but very often they replace it with constant news coverage online. So they really have made no significant change in their lives. They're still spoonfed with something that has never had any impact on them, and most likely never will.
Anything with a significant impact, and unfortunately many things without it, are relayed through friends, family and co-workers.
If the bomb drops or christ returns then we have a warning system setup all over Sweden that wakes anyone up.
I can only imagine bad things from watching the news. I can't prove anything but it can't be good to constantly be told about negative things happening halfway across the world.
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#3A news website that covers important issues rather than petty crimes.
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#4This site isn't perfect, but it's useful to know what's happening in the tech world. Knowing about the world's current events is similar. We shouldn't dwell on negative events, but they happen and they happen to real people. Just because they don't happen to us doesn't mean it's not affecting us in a broader human perspective. We are all in it together.
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#5I couldn't agree more with Aaron on that. A lot of people have started turning a blind eye to the TV, but very often they replace it with constant news coverage online. So they really have made no significant change in their lives. They're still spoonfed with something that has never had any impact on them, and most likely never will. Anything with a significant impact, and unfortunately many things without it, are r…
How does the warning system work for the return of christ? Church bells?
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#6One could choose the period, e.g. 7 days to the past, and see all important news from that time-frame.
It would of course require a human to tag the news as important within a period. Subscriber only feature would suffice.
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#7I wish news sites had a periodical system built-in. One could choose the period, e.g. 7 days to the past, and see all important news from that time-frame. It would of course require a human to tag the news as important within a period. Subscriber only feature would suffice.
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#8I worry about this attitude on a macro scale, but it's hard to argue with on a micro one. I spend most of my day following what's going on in the world, and it hasn't added much value to my life. But I worry about everyone not caring. Not because that would kill my company (I started it because I hate news in its current form too), but because there are times when public outrage changes things. It's like voting - my vote doesn't matter, but on aggregate it's everything.
I'm convinced that the goal of a good news publication should be like Google - to get you in and out the "door" as quickly as possible understanding what you need to know. We're rebuilding everything around that. A publication one can consume in thirty seconds with the most important stuff, ruthlessly curated and fact-checked. No entertainment gossip or puff pieces or PR pitches. (To get it as an email sign up at https://grasswire.com)
I'm looking forward to reading what others think on this subject.
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#9I wish news sites had a periodical system built-in. One could choose the period, e.g. 7 days to the past, and see all important news from that time-frame. It would of course require a human to tag the news as important within a period. Subscriber only feature would suffice.
Re: I Hate the News (2006)
#10I wish news sites had a periodical system built-in. One could choose the period, e.g. 7 days to the past, and see all important news from that time-frame. It would of course require a human to tag the news as important within a period. Subscriber only feature would suffice.
I believe those are called "weekly newspapers" :)