Origin of the IMG tag
1997.webhistory.org
Origin of the IMG tag
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#2Has it really been 14 years? Boy, time flies.
Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#3"No closing tag": nice, I wonder how (non-X) html became so unruly ;)
Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#4Worse is better:
http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0257.ht...
Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#5Anybody notice Guido van Russum commenting two messages into that chain?
http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0184.ht...
Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#6So old school, I love it.
Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#7Worse is better: http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0257.ht...
_Works_ is better. "Functional now" beats "theoretically great but not quite usable yet".
Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#8Anybody notice Guido van Russum commenting two messages into that chain? http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0184.ht...
from datetime import TimeMachine
Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#9Re: Origin of the IMG tag
#10Worse is better: http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0257.ht...
_Works_ is better. "Functional now" beats "theoretically great but not quite usable yet".
Speaking of that, anyone heard from Arc recently?
A 'works now' version would be nice, release the 3000 version later.