Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
1–10 of 32 posts
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#2Looks like some healthy competition to graphite
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#3Great news for them. I built a dashboard a few months ago using graphs which pull data from InfluxDB and I had a lot of fun with it. To me, it seem a whole lot easier to use than Graphite.
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#4Good luck on your journey Todd & Paul!
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#5One of the founders here. Thanks to the community for all the support and encouragement. We couldn't have gotten this far without people getting excited about our software. 2015 is going to be a great year for open source time series databases!
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#6The underlying technology is pretty cool and the team behind it is quite smart, glad to see they are being successful.
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#7[deleted]
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#8Already been done in 2001-2004: Sensage (http://www.sensage.com/, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensage), followed by Vertica, etc. All the columnar-storage big-table timestamped data collectors and data aggregators. Sensage failed at the market. Splunk succeeded, perhaps with a different underlying data storage model, but certainly with great marketing.
What's different about InfluxDB?
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#9InfluxDB is one of our favorite database (we host and run open source DBs ...). Most people can get more from their data by recognizing time series problems, and it's nice to have an easily accessible DB to put that sort of information into.
Re: Errplane (YC W13) Snags $8.1M for Open-Source InfluxDB Time Database
#10Already been done in 2001-2004: Sensage ( http://www.sensage.com/ , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensage ), followed by Vertica, etc. All the columnar-storage big-table timestamped data collectors and data aggregators. Sensage failed at the market. Splunk succeeded, perhaps with a different underlying data storage model, but certainly with great marketing. What's different about InfluxDB?
I'm not familiar with Sensage and I know of Vertica. Open source is a key difference. Developers want to build their products and careers on open tools and we want to help them do it when it comes to time series data.
There will be more as we go along. Our project is a year old and had 2-3 people working on it for most of the time.