How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
alex-buono.com
How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
1–10 of 61 posts
Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#2Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#3The light painting and lens-whacking details were awesome to read about. I'll definitely have to give the lens whacking a try.
Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#4so what ? and why is it on the home page of HN ?
On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.
It's really cool to see filmmakers doing their thing, even moreso if they're using really recent tech (3D printing, pixelbars, new camera stabilizers). Is that sufficient?
Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#5so what ? and why is it on the home page of HN ?
What to Submit On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity. It's really cool to see filmmakers doing their thing, even moreso if they're using really recent tech (3D printing, pixelbars, new camera stabilizers). Is that sufficient?
Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#6I used to shoot free form lenses, it was difficult to get a still from, shooting video would be a challenge. My (old) post on free lens shooting: https://mkaz.com/2005/01/08/homemade-lenses/
Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
What to Submit On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity. It's really cool to see filmmakers doing their thing, even moreso if they're using really recent tech (3D printing, pixelbars, new camera stabilizers). Is that sufficient?
[deleted]
The article has nothing to do with the content of SNL itself. If you're gonna just ignore that and get back on that tired old "SNL hasn't been cool since Eddie Murphy" horse then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
What to Submit On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity. It's really cool to see filmmakers doing their thing, even moreso if they're using really recent tech (3D printing, pixelbars, new camera stabilizers). Is that sufficient?
[deleted]
Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#9Re: How We Did It: SNL Title Sequence
#10Post-production is also a very technical process that takes a lot of time and effort to get right and involves exploring the particular quirks of your editing software and tricking it to get it to do what you want. There are often little moments of discovery where you do something you weren't even sure was possible. Then there are those serendipitous moments where visuals and audio come together better than you were anticipating or could have ever planned. It's a great feeling.
I encourage any programmers out there who have even a modicum of interest in the subject to go out there and experiment. Video production can be a great creative outlet that uses a lot of the same talents and opens up new artistic pathways.